Diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: falling through the net
- PMID: 26071759
- PMCID: PMC4526580
- DOI: 10.1007/s00125-015-3647-z
Diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: falling through the net
Abstract
Aims/hypothesis: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with increased risks to mother and child, but globally agreed diagnostic criteria remain elusive. Identification of women with GDM is important, as treatment reduces adverse outcomes such as perinatal death, shoulder dystocia and neonatal hypoglycaemia. Recently, the UK's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommended new diagnostic thresholds for GDM which are different from the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria endorsed by the WHO. The study aim was to assess neonatal and obstetric outcomes among women who would test positive for the IADPSG criteria but negative for the NICE 2015 criteria.
Methods: Data from 25,543 consecutive singleton live births (2004-2008) were obtained retrospectively from hospital records. Women were screened with a random plasma glucose (RPG; 12-16 weeks) and a 50 g glucose challenge test (GCT; 26-28 weeks). If RPG >7.0 mmol/l, GCT >7.7 mmol/l or symptoms were present, a 75 g OGTT was offered (n = 3,848).
Results: In this study, GDM prevalence was 4.13% (NICE 2015) and 4.62% (IADPSG). Women who 'fell through the net', testing NICE-negative but IADPSG-positive (n = 387), had a higher risk of having a large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infant (birthweight >90th percentile for gestational age; adjusted OR [95% CI] 3.12 [2.44, 3.98]), Caesarean delivery (1.44 [1.15, 1.81]) and polyhydramnios (6.90 [3.94, 12.08]) compared with women with negative screening results and no OGTT (n = 21,695). LGA risk was highest among women with fasting plasma glucose 5.1-5.5 mmol/l (n = 167): the mean birthweight was 350 g above that of the reference population and 37.7% of infants were LGA.
Conclusions/interpretation: The IADPSG criteria identify women at substantial risk of complications who would not be identified by the NICE 2015 criteria.
Figures
Comment in
-
Diagnosis of gestational diabetes, defining the net, refining the catch.Diabetologia. 2015 Sep;58(9):1965-8. doi: 10.1007/s00125-015-3695-4. Epub 2015 Jul 15. Diabetologia. 2015. PMID: 26173673
-
Likelihood of 'falling through the net' relates to contemporary prevalence of gestational diabetes.Diabetologia. 2015 Nov;58(11):2671-2. doi: 10.1007/s00125-015-3732-3. Epub 2015 Aug 8. Diabetologia. 2015. PMID: 26253768 No abstract available.
-
Likelihood of 'falling through the net' relates to contemporary prevalence of gestational diabetes. Reply to Ikomi A, Mannan S, Anthony R, Kiss S [letter].Diabetologia. 2015 Nov;58(11):2673-5. doi: 10.1007/s00125-015-3737-y. Epub 2015 Aug 29. Diabetologia. 2015. PMID: 26315806 No abstract available.
References
-
- Metzger BE, Coustan DR. Summary and recommendations of the Fourth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. The Organizing Committee. Diabetes Care. 1998;21(Suppl 2):B161–B167. - PubMed
-
- World Health Organisation (2013) Diagnostic criteria and classification of hyperglycaemia first detected in pregnancy. Available from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/85975/1/WHO_NMH_MND_13.2_eng.pdf, accessed 20 Apr 2015 - PubMed
-
- Simmons D. Epidemiologic context of diabetes in pregnancy. In: McCance DR, Maresh M, Sacks DA, editors. A practical manual of diabetes in pregnancy. Oxford: Blackwell; 2010. pp. 3–17.
-
- Ovesen PG, Jensen DM, Damm P, Rasmussen S, Kesmodel US. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes. A nation-wide study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015 - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources