Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Oct;108(10):472-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2015.03.004. Epub 2015 Jun 10.

Remote ischaemic preconditioning in intermittent claudication

Affiliations
Free article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Remote ischaemic preconditioning in intermittent claudication

Hermeland Delagarde et al. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2015 Oct.
Free article

Abstract

Background: Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) protects tissues against ischaemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury, a common occurrence in several clinical settings.

Aims: To evaluate whether RIPC has a beneficial impact on walking disability in arterial intermittent claudication.

Methods: A total of 20 patients with proven intermittent claudication underwent two treadmill walking tests with a 7-day interval in between; they were randomized according to the order in which they received either RIPC or a control procedure before the first treadmill test, with a crossover at the second test. Patients received three cycles of alternating 5-minute inflation and 5-minute deflation of blood-pressure cuffs on both arms, with inflation to a pressure of 200 mmHg in the RIPC procedure or 10mmHg in the control procedure. Walking distances and limb oxygenation data, assessed with transcutaneous oximetry and near infrared spectroscopy measurements, were obtained during both RIPC and control procedures in all patients.

Results: Similar exercise intensities were achieved after the control and RIPC procedures. Walking distances did not significantly differ after the control and RIPC procedures (204 [141-259]m vs 215 [162-442]m, respectively; P=0.22). Similarly, no difference was observed in terms of transcutaneous oxygen pressure change and near infrared spectroscopy measurements during exercise between the two procedures.

Conclusion: RIPC did not improve walking distance or limb ischaemia variables in patients with peripheral artery disease and intermittent claudication.

Keywords: Artériopathie oblitérante des membres inférieurs; Conditionnement ischémique à distance; Ischaemia-reperfusion; Ischémie-reperfusion; Peripheral artery disease; Remote conditioning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources