Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Sep:142:345-50.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.009. Epub 2015 Jun 11.

Anticipatory coarticulation facilitates word recognition in toddlers

Affiliations

Anticipatory coarticulation facilitates word recognition in toddlers

Tristan Mahr et al. Cognition. 2015 Sep.

Abstract

Children learn from their environments and their caregivers. To capitalize on learning opportunities, young children have to recognize familiar words efficiently by integrating contextual cues across word boundaries. Previous research has shown that adults can use phonetic cues from anticipatory coarticulation during word recognition. We asked whether 18-24 month-olds (n=29) used coarticulatory cues on the word "the" when recognizing the following noun. We performed a looking-while-listening eyetracking experiment to examine word recognition in neutral vs. facilitating coarticulatory conditions. Participants looked to the target image significantly sooner when the determiner contained facilitating coarticulatory cues. These results provide the first evidence that novice word-learners can take advantage of anticipatory sub-phonemic cues during word recognition.

Keywords: Coarticulation; Eye tracking; Language development; Lexical development; Word learning; Word recognition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
F1 and F2 formants of the tokens of the determiner the for the three item types. Note the canonical formant transitions for the facilitating tokens and the steady formant values in the neutral token.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Proportion looking to target from onset of the to 1250 ms after target-word onset in the two conditions. Symbols and error bars represent observed means ±SE. Dashed vertical lines mark onset of the, target-word onset, and target-word offset.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Growth curve estimates of looking probability during analysis window. Symbols and lines represent model estimates, and ribbon represents ±SE. Empirical logit values on y-axis correspond to proportions of .5, .62, .73, .82. Note that the curves are essentially phase-shifted by 100 ms.

References

    1. Barr DJ. Analyzing “visual world” eyetracking data using multilevel logistic regression. Journal of Memory and Language. 2008;59(4):457–474. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.09.002. - DOI
    1. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. 2014 Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4.
    1. Charles-Luce J, Luce PA. Similarity neighbourhoods of words in young children’s lexicons. Journal of Child Language. 1990;17(1):205–215. doi: 10.1017/S0305000900013180. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Charles-Luce J, Luce PA. An examination of similarity neighbourhoods in young children’s receptive vocabularies. Journal of Child Language. 1995;22(3):727–735. doi: 10.1017/S0305000900010023. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dahan D, Magnuson JS, Tanenhaus MK, Hogan EM. Subcategorical mismatches and the time course of lexical access: evidence for lexical competition. Language and Cognitive Processes. 2001;16(5–6):507–534. doi: 10.1080/01690960143000074. - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources