Assessing the Quality of Care for Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction in China
- PMID: 26074496
- PMCID: PMC6711066
- DOI: 10.1002/clc.22405
Assessing the Quality of Care for Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction in China
Abstract
There is a wide practice gap between optimal care and actual care for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in China. Indicators of quality of care for AMI patients have already been developed by a modified Delphi process. Our aim was to assess the association between those indicators and in-hospital mortality in AMI patients. We hypothesized that an association exists between quality-of-care indicators and in-hospital mortality in AMI patients. Based on the data of 2128 AMI patients at 20 tertiary hospitals in Heilongjiang Province from January 1, 2009 to October 31, 2010, we estimated the compliance rates of indicators. Association between indicators and in-hospital mortality was assessed using hierarchical generalized linear models. Among 2128 patients, 163 (7.66%) died during their hospital stay. The compliance rates were 71.6%, 41.3%, 82.5%, 63.5%, 80.4%, 5.1%, 28.9%, and 41.2% for the use of aspirin, β-blocker, clopidogrel, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, statin, thrombolytic, percutaneous coronary intervention, and coronary angiography, respectively. Aspirin, clopidogrel, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, statin, and percutaneous coronary intervention were significantly associated with in-hospital mortality after adjustment for potential confounding factors. We found some disparities between guidelines and clinical practice for AMI patients in China and a significant association between indicators and in-hospital mortality. Our findings are potentially helpful for assessing and improving the quality of care for AMI patients in China.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
References
-
- Fox KA, Goodman SG, Klein W, et al. Management of acute coronary syndromes. Variations in practice and outcome: findings from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). Eur Heart J. 2002;23:1177–1189. - PubMed
-
- Spertus JA, Radford MJ, Every NR, et al. Challenges and opportunities in quantifying the quality of care for acute myocardial infarction: summary from the Acute Myocardial Infarction Working Group of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology First Scientific Forum on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research in Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke. Circulation. 2003;107:1681–1691. - PubMed
-
- Bradley EH, Herrin J, Elbel B, et al. Hospital quality for acute myocardial infarction: correlation among process measures and relationship with short‐term mortality. JAMA. 2006;296:72–78. - PubMed
-
- Spertus JA, Eagle KA, Krumholz HM, et al. American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association methodology for the selection and creation of performance measures for quantifying the quality of cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2005;111:1703–1712. - PubMed
-
- Hickey A, Scott I, Denaro C, et al. Using clinical indicators in a quality improvement programme targeting cardiac care. Int J Qual Health Care. 2004;16(suppl 1):i11–i25. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous