No training required: experimental tests support homology-based DNA assembly as a best practice in synthetic biology
- PMID: 26075023
- PMCID: PMC4464999
- DOI: 10.1186/s13036-015-0006-z
No training required: experimental tests support homology-based DNA assembly as a best practice in synthetic biology
Erratum in
-
Erratum to: No training required: experimental tests support homology-based DNA assembly as a best practice in synthetic biology.J Biol Eng. 2016 Jan 7;10:1. doi: 10.1186/s13036-015-0013-0. eCollection 2016. J Biol Eng. 2016. PMID: 26752998 Free PMC article.
Abstract
The Registry of Standard Biological Parts imposes sequence constraints to enable DNA assembly using restriction enzymes. Alnahhas et al. (Journal of Biological Engineering 2014, 8:28) recently argued that these constraints should be revised because they impose an unnecessary burden on contributors that use homology-based assembly. To add to this debate, we tested four different homology-based methods, and found that students using these methods on their first attempt have a high probability of success. Because of their ease of use and high success rates, we believe that homology-based assembly is a best practice of Synthetic Biology, and recommend that the Registry implement the changes proposed by Alnahhas et al. to better support their use.
Keywords: Cloning; DNA assembly; Gibson; PCR; Seamless; Synthetic biology; iGEM.
Figures


References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources