Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015:2015:796762.
doi: 10.1155/2015/796762. Epub 2015 May 14.

Disinfection of Needleless Connector Hubs: Clinical Evidence Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

Disinfection of Needleless Connector Hubs: Clinical Evidence Systematic Review

Nancy L Moureau et al. Nurs Res Pract. 2015.

Abstract

Background. Needleless connectors (NC) are used on virtually all intravascular devices, providing an easy access point for infusion connection. Colonization of NC is considered the cause of 50% of postinsertion catheter-related infections. Breaks in aseptic technique, from failure to disinfect, result in contamination and subsequent biofilm formation within NC and catheters increasing the potential for infection of central and peripheral catheters. Methods. This systematic review evaluated 140 studies and 34 abstracts on NC disinfection practices, the impact of hub contamination on infection, and measures of education and compliance. Results. The greatest risk for contamination of the catheter after insertion is the NC with 33-45% contaminated, and compliance with disinfection as low as 10%. The optimal technique or disinfection time has not been identified, although scrubbing with 70% alcohol for 5-60 seconds is recommended. Studies have reported statistically significant results in infection reduction when passive alcohol disinfection caps are used (48-86% reduction). Clinical Implications. It is critical for healthcare facilities and clinicians to take responsibility for compliance with basic principles of asepsis compliance, to involve frontline staff in strategies, to facilitate education that promotes understanding of the consequences of failure, and to comply with the standard of care for hub disinfection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1

References

    1. Hadaway L. Needleless connectors: Improving practice, reducing risks. Journal of the Association for Vascular Access. 2011;16(1):20–30. doi: 10.2309/java.16-1-4. - DOI
    1. Btaiche I. F., Kovacevich D. S., Khalidi N., Papke L. F. The effects of needleless connectors on catheter-related bloodstream infections. American Journal of Infection Control. 2011;39(4):277–283. - PubMed
    1. Jarvis W. R., Murphy C., Hall K. K., et al. Health care-associated bloodstream infections associated with negative- or positive-pressure or displacement mechanical valve needleless connectors. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2009;49(12):1821–1827. doi: 10.1086/648418. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bouza E., Muñoz P., López-Rodríguez J., et al. A needleless closed system device (CLAVE) protects from intravascular catheter tip and hub colonization: a prospective randomized study. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2003;54(4):279–287. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(03)00136-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chernecky C., Waller J. Comparative evaluation of five needleless intravenous connectors. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2011;67(7):1601–1613. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05598.x. - DOI - PubMed