Comparison of perioperative outcomes between running versus interrupted vesicourethral anastomosis in open radical prostatectomy: A single-surgeon experience
- PMID: 26078841
- PMCID: PMC4462634
- DOI: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.6.443
Comparison of perioperative outcomes between running versus interrupted vesicourethral anastomosis in open radical prostatectomy: A single-surgeon experience
Abstract
Purpose: To compare perioperative outcomes between running and interrupted vesicourethral anastomosis in open radical prostatectomy (RP).
Materials and methods: The medical records of 112 patients who underwent open RP for prostate cancer at our institution from 2006 to 2008 by a single surgeon were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters were measured.
Results: Of 112 consecutive patients, 62 patients underwent vesicourethral anastomosis by use of the running technique, whereas 50 patients underwent anastomosis with the interrupted technique. The groups did not differ significantly in age, body mass index, prostate-specific antigen, prostate volume, or pathologic findings. The intraoperative extravasation rate was significantly lower in the running group (8.1% vs. 24.0%, p=0.01). The mean anastomosis time was 15.1±5.3 and 19.3±4.6 minutes in the running and interrupted groups, respectively (p=0.04). The rates of postoperative extravasation were similar for both groups (6.4% vs. 10.0%, p=0.12). The duration of catheterization was significantly shorter in the running group (9.0±3.0 days vs. 12.9±6.4 days, p<0.01). The rate of urinary retention after catheter removal and the rate of bladder neck contracture were not significantly different between the two groups. The rate of urinary continence at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after RP was also similar in both groups.
Conclusions: Both anastomosis techniques provided similar functional results and a similar rate of postoperative urine extravasation. However, running vesicourethral anastomosis decreased the rate of intraoperative extravasation and time for anastomosis, without increasing the risk of urinary retention or bladder neck contracture.
Keywords: Prostatectomy; Prostatic neoplasms; Surgical anastomosis; Urine.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Running suture versus interrupted suture for vesicourethral anastomosis in retropubic radical prostatectomy: a randomized study.Int J Urol. 2015 Mar;22(3):271-7. doi: 10.1111/iju.12667. Epub 2014 Nov 16. Int J Urol. 2015. PMID: 25400263 Clinical Trial.
-
Vesicourethral anastomosis during endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparison between the single-knot running and interrupted technique.Urology. 2006 Dec;68(6):1284-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.08.1063. Epub 2006 Dec 4. Urology. 2006. PMID: 17141837
-
Single Running Suture versus Single-Knot Running Suture for Vesicourethral Anastomosis in Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective Randomised Comparative Study.Urol Int. 2015;95(4):445-51. doi: 10.1159/000438829. Epub 2015 Aug 22. Urol Int. 2015. PMID: 26655169 Clinical Trial.
-
Interrupted versus Continuous Suturing for Vesicourethral Anastomosis During Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Nov;5(6):980-991. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.05.009. Epub 2018 Jun 13. Eur Urol Focus. 2019. PMID: 29907547
-
[Simplified vesico-urethral anastomosis after radical retropubic prostatectomy for cancer. A preliminary comparative study].J Urol (Paris). 1995;101(3):113-21. J Urol (Paris). 1995. PMID: 8558028 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Early Continence and Extravasation After Open Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy - Interrupted vs Continuous Suturing for Vesicourethral Anastomosis.Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2020 Dec 23;16:1289-1296. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S278454. eCollection 2020. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2020. PMID: 33380800 Free PMC article.
-
Association between cystographic anastomotic urinary leakage following retropubic radical prostatectomy and early urinary incontinence.Yeungnam Univ J Med. 2021 Apr;38(2):142-147. doi: 10.12701/yujm.2020.00682. Epub 2020 Nov 19. Yeungnam Univ J Med. 2021. PMID: 33207402 Free PMC article.
-
Randomized controlled trial comparing open anterograde anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy with retrograde technique.Asian J Urol. 2023 Apr;10(2):151-157. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2021.11.008. Epub 2021 Nov 25. Asian J Urol. 2023. PMID: 36942119 Free PMC article.
-
Open radical prostatectomy reproducing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Involving antegrade nerve sparing and continuous anastomosis.Int Braz J Urol. 2017 Nov-Dec;43(6):1043-1051. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0627. Int Braz J Urol. 2017. PMID: 29039893 Free PMC article.
-
A Pragmatic Randomized Trial Comparing Suturing Techniques for Vesicourethral Anastomosis: One-Year Voiding Function Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy.J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 3;14(11):3934. doi: 10.3390/jcm14113934. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40507695 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Igel TC, Barrett DM, Rife CC. Comparison of techniques for vesicourethral anastomosis: simple direct versus modified Vest traction sutures. Urology. 1988;31:474–477. - PubMed
-
- Surya BV, Provet J, Johanson KE, Brown J. Anastomotic strictures following radical prostatectomy: risk factors and management. J Urol. 1990;143:755–758. - PubMed
-
- Lieber D, Tran V, Belani J, Ames C, Morissey K, Yan Y, et al. Comparison of running and interrupted vesicourethral anastomoses in a porcine model. J Endourol. 2005;19:1109–1113. - PubMed
-
- Poulakis V, Skriapas K, de Vries R, Dillenburg W, Witzsch U, Becht E. Vesicourethral anastomosis during endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparison between the single-knot running and interrupted technique. Urology. 2006;68:1284–1289. - PubMed
-
- Harpster LE, Brien J. Initial results using a running vesicourethral anastomosis following open radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol. 2007;177:118–122. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical