Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jun;108(6):372-6.
doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000300.

Incorporating Patient Satisfaction Metrics in Assessing Multidisciplinary Breast Cancer Care Quality

Jennifer L Harper  1 , Anna-Maria A De Costa  1 , Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer  1 , Katherine R Sterba  1
Affiliations

Incorporating Patient Satisfaction Metrics in Assessing Multidisciplinary Breast Cancer Care Quality

Jennifer L Harper et al. South Med J. 2015 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: The Medical University of South Carolina implemented a patient-centered multidisciplinary breast clinic program (MDBC) in August 2012. In this study, patient satisfaction with the MDBC care delivery model and communication with healthcare providers was examined to inform the refinement of the MDBC program.

Methods: During the first 10 months of the MDBC, patients were asked to complete a 14-question postconsultation telephone survey. A statistical analysis was performed to explore potential associations between age, race, and stage with overall patient satisfaction scores.

Results: Overall, patients (N = 52, 56% white, 42% African American, 2% Hispanic; mean age 61 years) rated the quality of care highly (mean 4.7, range [1 = poor to 5 = excellent]) and felt comfortable with their plan of care (mean 1.63, range [1 = extremely comfortable to 5 = not at all comfortable]). No statistically significant differences in overall satisfaction were found by age, race, or stage; however, patient responses were commonly not optimal (ie, either "no" or "yes, but not as much as I would like") when asked if the care team addressed the impact of their diagnosis on personal relationships (40.4%) or emotional health (28.9%).

Conclusions: Patients were highly satisfied with the care they received in the MDBC program. Findings suggest that this model is well suited to a diverse patient population and have highlighted quality improvement targets such as increased emphasis on providers' communication about psychosocial issues.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patients report high overall satisfaction with care. Patient-reported scores are represented by mean ± 95% confidence interval in a sample of 52 patients.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
No significant differences identified among different demographic groups. Patient-reported scores are represented by mean ± 95% confidence interval.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Institute of Medicine. Delivering High-Quality Cancer Care: Charting a New Course for a System in Crisis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2013. - PubMed
    1. Fennell ML, Das IP, Clauser S, et al. The organization of multidisciplinary care teams: modeling internal and external influences on cancer care quality. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;2010:72–80. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Cancer Institute. [Accessed May 13, 2015];Follow-up Care Use Among Survivors (FOCUS) survey. http://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/ocs/resources/focus.html.
    1. Arora NK. Interacting with cancer patients: the significance of physicians' communication behavior. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57:791–806. - PubMed
    1. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42:377–381. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types