Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Dec;92(6):560-6.
doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.06.009. Epub 2015 Jun 14.

Effects of initiating a contraceptive implant on subsequent condom use: A randomized controlled trial

Carole Rattray  1 , Jeffrey Wiener  2 , Jennifer Legardy-Williams  2 , Elizabeth Costenbader  3 , Karen Pazol  2 , Natalie Medley-Singh  1 , Margaret C Snead  1 , Markus J Steiner  3 , Denise J Jamieson  2 , Lee Warner  2 , Maria F Gallo  4 , Tina Hylton-Kong  5 , Athena P Kourtis  6
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of initiating a contraceptive implant on subsequent condom use: A randomized controlled trial

Carole Rattray et al. Contraception. 2015 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether initiation of a contraceptive implant, a method of long-acting reversible contraception, reduces condom use, as measured by a biomarker of recent semen exposure [prostate-specific antigen (PSA)].

Study design: We conducted a randomized controlled clinical trial in which 414 Jamaican women at high risk for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) attending family planning clinics received the contraceptive implant at baseline ("immediate" insertion arm, N=208) or at the end ("delayed" insertion arm, N=206) of a 3-month study period. Participants were tested for PSA at baseline and two follow-up study visits and were asked about their sexual activity and condom use.

Results: At baseline, 24.9% of women tested positive for PSA. At both follow-up visits, the prevalence of PSA detection did not significantly differ between the immediate versus delayed insertion arm [1-month: 26.1% vs. 20.2%, prevalence ratio (PR)=1.3, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.9-1.9; 3-month: 25.6% vs. 23.1%, PR= 1.1, 95% CI=0.8-1.6]. The change in PSA positivity over the three study visits was not significantly larger in the immediate arm compared to the delayed arm (1-sided p-value of .15).

Conclusions: Contraceptive implants can be successfully introduced into a population at high risk of unintended pregnancy and STIs without a biologically detectable difference in unprotected sex in the short term. This information strengthens the evidence to support promotion of implants in such populations and can help refine counseling for promoting and maintaining use of condoms among women who choose to use implants.

Implications: Sex unprotected by a condom was not higher over 3 months in women receiving a contraceptive implant, compared with those not receiving the implant.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01684358.

Keywords: Condom use; Contraceptive implant; LARC; PSA; Randomized controlled trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Enrollment and follow-up of study participants.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Sedgh G, Singh S, Hussain R. Intended and unintended pregnancies worldwide in 2012 and recent trends. Stud Fam Plann 2014;45(3):301–14. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singh S, Sedgh G, Hussain R. Unintended pregnancy: worldwide levels, trends, and outcomes. Stud Fam Plann 2010;41(4):241–50. - PubMed
    1. Dixit P, Ram F, Dwivedi LK. Determinants of unwanted pregnancies in India using matched case–control designs. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2012;12:84. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Le HH, Connolly MP, Bahamondes L, Cecatti JG, Yu J, Hu HX. The burden of unintended pregnancies in Brazil: a social and public health system cost analysis. Int J Womens Health 2014;6:663–70. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kaufmann RB, Morris L, Spitz AM. Comparison of two question sequences for assessing pregnancy intentions. Am J Epidemiol 1997;145(9):810–6. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data