Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jun 16;10(6):e0129887.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129887. eCollection 2015.

Lateral Dispersal and Foraging Behavior of Entomopathogenic Nematodes in the Absence and Presence of Mobile and Non-Mobile Hosts

Affiliations

Lateral Dispersal and Foraging Behavior of Entomopathogenic Nematodes in the Absence and Presence of Mobile and Non-Mobile Hosts

Harit K Bal et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Entomopathogenic nematodes have been classified into cruisers (active searchers) and ambushers (sit and wait foragers). However, little is known about their dispersal and foraging behavior at population level in soil. We studied lateral dispersal of the ambush foraging Steinernema carpocapsae (ALL strain) and cruise foraging Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (GPS11 strain) from infected host cadavers in microcosms (0.05 m2) containing Wooster silt-loam soil (Oxyaquic fragiudalf) and vegetation in the presence or absence of non-mobile and mobile hosts. Results showed that the presence of a non-mobile host (Galleria mellonella larva in a wire mesh cage) enhanced H. bacteriophora dispersal for up to 24 hr compared with no-host treatment, but had no impact on S. carpocapsae dispersal. In contrast, presence of a mobile host (G. mellonella larvae) increased dispersal of S. carpocapsae compared with no host treatment, but had no effect on H. bacteriophora dispersal. Also H. bacteriophora was better at infecting non-mobile than mobile hosts released into the microcosms and S. carpocapsae was better at infecting mobile than non-mobile hosts, thus affirming the established cruiser-ambusher theory. However, results also revealed that a large proportion of infective juveniles (IJs) of both species stayed near (≤ 3.8 cm) the source cadaver (88-96% S. carpocapsae; 67-79% H. bacteriophora), and the proportion of IJs reaching the farthest distance (11.4 cm) was significantly higher for S. carpocapsae (1.4%) than H. bacteriophora (0.4%) in the presence of mobile hosts. S. carpocapsae also had higher average population displacement than H. bacteriophora in the presence of both the non-mobile (5.07 vs. 3.6 cm/day) and mobile (8.06 vs. 5.3 cm/day) hosts. We conclude that the two species differ in their dispersal and foraging behavior at the population level and this behavior is affected by both the presence and absence of hosts and by their mobility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Experimental design.
A pictorial representation of the experimental design showing 0.05 m2 sized microcosm used for studying dispersal of infective juveniles (IJs) emerging from the source nematode-infected cadaver (black rectangle) placed in the center in the presence of a non-mobile host (Galleria mellonella larva in a wire mesh cage) (A) and mobile hosts (G. mellonella larvae) (B). Each microcosm was divided into four quadrants. Host insects released in the microcosm are represented by empty circles. Soil cores samples were collected from 2 cm wide arcs (dotted lines) in the microcosms containing non-mobile host at different distances marked by black spots and at different time intervals depicted by the transects running through the microcosms at 12, 24, 48 and 72 hr, and then baited with live G. mellonella larvae in plastic cups (30 ml) to recover the dispersed IJs. Similarly, soil core samples were collected from 2 cm wide annuli (dotted circles) at different distances starting from the outer edge of the wire-mesh cylinder (bold circle) and at different time intervals in the microcosms with and without mobile hosts.

References

    1. Taylor LR. The four kinds of migration In: Danthanarayana W, editor. Insect Flight: Dispersal and Migration. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany; 1986. pp. 265–280.
    1. Slatkin M. Gene flow in natural populations. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1985;16:393–430.
    1. Bowler DE, Benton TG. Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics. Biol Rev. 2005;80: 205–225. - PubMed
    1. Allendorf FW, Luikart G. Conservation and the genetics of populations. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK; 2007.
    1. Travis JMJ. The color of noise and the evolution of dispersal. Ecol Res. 2001;16: 157–163.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources