Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2015 Jun 17:16:275.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0783-1.

Outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses of appendicitis treatments in children: a systematic review

Nigel J Hall  1   2 , Mufiza Z Kapadia  3 , Simon Eaton  4 , Winnie W Y Chan  5 , Cheri Nickel  6 , Agostino Pierro  7 , Martin Offringa  8
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses of appendicitis treatments in children: a systematic review

Nigel J Hall et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: Acute appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency in children. Despite this, there is no core outcome set (COS) described for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in children with appendicitis and hence no consensus regarding outcome selection, definition and reporting. We aimed to identify outcomes currently reported in studies of paediatric appendicitis.

Methods: Using a defined, sensitive search strategy, we identified RCTs and systematic reviews (SRs) of treatment interventions in children with appendicitis. Included studies were all in English and investigated the effect of one or more treatment interventions in children with acute appendicitis or undergoing appendicectomy for presumed acute appendicitis. Studies were reviewed and data extracted by two reviewers. Primary (if defined) and all other outcomes were recorded and assigned to the core areas 'Death', 'Pathophysiological Manifestations', 'Life Impact', 'Resource Use' and 'Adverse Events', using OMERACT Filter 2.0.

Results: A total of 63 studies met the inclusion criteria reporting outcomes from 51 RCTs and nine SRs. Only 25 RCTs and four SRs defined a primary outcome. A total of 115 unique and different outcomes were identified. RCTs reported a median of nine outcomes each (range 1 to 14). The most frequently reported outcomes were wound infection (43 RCTs, nine SRs), intra-peritoneal abscess (41 RCTs, seven SRs) and length of stay (35 RCTs, six SRs) yet all three were reported in just 25 RCTs and five SRs. Common outcomes had multiple different definitions or were frequently not defined. Although outcomes were reported within all core areas, just one RCT and no SR reported outcomes for all core areas. Outcomes assigned to the 'Death' and 'Life Impact' core areas were reported least frequently (in six and 15 RCTs respectively).

Conclusions: There is a wide heterogeneity in the selection and definition of outcomes in paediatric appendicitis, and little overlap in outcomes used across studies. A paucity of studies report patient relevant outcomes within the 'Life Impact' core area. These factors preclude meaningful evidence synthesis, and pose challenges to designing prospective clinical trials and cohort studies. The development of a COS for paediatric appendicitis is warranted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA article selection flow diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Assignment of outcome terms to core areas. WCC white cell count, CRP C-reactive protein, PROM patient reported outcome measure
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
a Outcome matrix of 38 outcome terms for 51 RCTs b. Outcome matrix of 20 outcome terms reported in 9 systematic reviews (SRs)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
a Distribution of core areas to which outcome terms were assigned in RCTs. b Distribution of core areas to which outcome terms were assigned in SRs
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. St Peter SD, Tsao K, Spilde TL, Holcomb GW, III, Sharp SW, Murphy JP, et al. Single daily dosing ceftriaxone and metronidazole versus standard triple antibiotic regimen for perforated appendicitis in children: a prospective randomized trial. J Pediatr Surg. 2008;43:981–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.02.018. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blomqvist PG, Andersson RE, Granath F, Lambe MP, Ekbom AR. Mortality after appendectomy in Sweden, 1987–1996. Ann Surg. 2001;233:455–60. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200104000-00001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Styrud J, Eriksson S, Nilsson I, Ahlberg G, Haapaniemi S, Neovius G, et al. Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment in acute appendicitis. a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial. World J Surg. 2006;30:1033–7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0304-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hansson J, Korner U, Khorram-Manesh A, Solberg A, Lundholm K. Randomized clinical trial of antibiotic therapy versus appendicectomy as primary treatment of acute appendicitis in unselected patients. Br J Surg. 2009;96:473–81. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6482. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vons C, Barry C, Maitre S, Pautrat K, Leconte M, Costaglioli B, et al. Amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid versus appendicectomy for treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;377:1573–9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60410-8. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types