Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Oct;35(10):959-67.
doi: 10.1002/pd.4637. Epub 2015 Sep 25.

Global perspectives on clinical adoption of NIPT

Affiliations

Global perspectives on clinical adoption of NIPT

Mollie A Minear et al. Prenat Diagn. 2015 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: The goals of this study were to assess global trends in clinical implementation of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT), as commercial tests are marketed increasingly worldwide, and to identify potential challenges for current or future use.

Methods: We surveyed clinicians from 46 countries about the availability of NIPT, their experiences with using NIPT, and their views on clinical, ethical, and legal issues affecting implementation in their countries.

Results: Forty-nine respondents from 28 countries completed the survey. The majority reported that NIPT is available in their country (n = 43) and that they offer NIPT in their current practice (n = 38). Eighteen respondents from 14 countries reported that there are plans to introduce NIPT into routine prenatal care in their country. Test prices varied widely, ranging from $350 to $2900, and several respondents observed that high test prices limited or restricted widespread use of NIPT. Responses varied both across and within countries regarding who is offered NIPT and what the overall screening protocol should be.

Conclusion: This study provides a snapshot of current use and experiences with NIPT globally. It also highlights differences in service provision that exists both across and within countries, emphasizing the need for developing national and international implementation guidelines for NIPT.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

disclosures: MAM, CL, SP, SC: none.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Current prices of NIPT around the world
All costs were provided by respondents in their local currency, and were converted into USD (US dollars) to facilitate comparison. Some respondents provided a range of prices (denoted by a vertical colored line) while others provided a single cost (denoted by a single diamond). For some countries, multiple respondents took the survey; as such, prices and ranges were combined. The average test price reported by respondents, approximately $874 USD, is denoted by a red horizontal dashed line. Countries are graphed from left to right in alphabetical order.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Commercial NIPT providers used by respondents in their own medical practices
Thirty nine respondents answered the question “Which of the following companies’ tests do you offer in your practice?” While respondents were provided with both the company and test name, only the company names are presented here. At the time of the survey, Berry Genomics had ceased all operations in China pending approval from the Chinese Food and Drug Administration.

References

    1. Tabor A, Alfirevic Z. Update on procedure-related risks for prenatal diagnosis techniques. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2010;27(1):1–7. - PubMed
    1. van Schendel RV, Kleinveld JH, Dondorp WJ, et al. Attitudes of pregnant women and male partners towards non-invasive prenatal testing and widening the scope of prenatal screening. Eur J Hum Genet. 2014;22(12):1345–50. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lewis C, Silcock C, Chitty LS. Non-invasive prenatal testing for Down's syndrome: pregnant women's views and likely uptake. Public Health Genomics. 2013;16(5):223–32. - PubMed
    1. Yi H, Hallowell N, Griffiths S, et al. Motivations for undertaking DNA sequencing-based non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy: a qualitative study with early adopter patients in Hong Kong. PloS One. 2013;8(11):e81794. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Skirton H, Patch C. Factors affecting the clinical use of non-invasive prenatal testing: a mixed methods systematic review. Prenat Diagn. 2013;33(6):532–41. - PubMed

Publication types