ISAT: end of the debate on coiling versus clipping? - Authors' reply

Affiliations

¹ Oxford Neurovascular and Neuroradiology Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK. Electronic address: andy.molyneux@nds.ox.ac.uk.
² Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Oxford, UK.
³ Department of Neurosurgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.

Comment

Andrew J Molyneux et al. Lancet. 2015.

. 2015 Jun 6;385(9984):2252.

doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61061-3.

¹ Oxford Neurovascular and Neuroradiology Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK. Electronic address: andy.molyneux@nds.ox.ac.uk.
² Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Oxford, UK.
³ Department of Neurosurgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.

No abstract available

Comment on

The durability of endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: 18 year follow-up of the UK cohort of the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT).
Molyneux AJ, Birks J, Clarke A, Sneade M, Kerr RS. Molyneux AJ, et al. Lancet. 2015 Feb 21;385(9969):691-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60975-2. Epub 2014 Oct 28. Lancet. 2015. PMID: 25465111 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
ISAT: end of the debate on coiling versus clipping?
Korja M. Korja M. Lancet. 2015 Jun 6;385(9984):2250-1. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61059-5. Lancet. 2015. PMID: 26088493 No abstract available.
ISAT: end of the debate on coiling versus clipping?
Bakker NA, Veeger NJ, Van Dijk JM. Bakker NA, et al. Lancet. 2015 Jun 6;385(9984):2251. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61060-1. Lancet. 2015. PMID: 26088494 No abstract available.