The Role of Human Papillomavirus Genotyping in Cervical Cancer Screening: A Large-Scale Evaluation of the cobas HPV Test
- PMID: 26088703
- PMCID: PMC4560647
- DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-1353
The Role of Human Papillomavirus Genotyping in Cervical Cancer Screening: A Large-Scale Evaluation of the cobas HPV Test
Abstract
Background: The cobas HPV Test ("cobas"; Roche Molecular Systems) detects HPV16 and HPV18 individually, and a pool of 12 other high-risk (HR) HPV types. The test is approved for (i) atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) triage to determine need for colposcopy, (ii) combined screening with cytology ("cotesting"), and (iii) primary HPV screening.
Methods: To assess the possible value of HPV16/18 typing, >17,000 specimens from a longitudinal cohort study of initially HPV-positive women (HC2, Qiagen) were retested with cobas. To study accuracy, cobas genotyping results were compared with those of an established method, the Linear Array HPV Genotyping Test (LA, Roche Molecular Systems). Clinical value of the typing strategy was evaluated by linking the cobas results (supplemented by other available typing results) to 3-year cumulative risks of CIN3+.
Results: Grouped hierarchically (HPV16, else HPV18, else other HR types, else negative), the κ statistic for agreement between cobas and LA was 0.86 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.86-0.87]. In all three scenarios, HPV16-positive women were at much higher 3-year risk of CIN3+ than HPV16-negative women: women ages 21 and older with ASC-US (14.5%; 95% CI, 13.5%-15.5% vs. 3.5%; 95% CI, 3.3-3.6); women ages 30 years and older that were HPV-positive cytology-negative (10.3%; 95% CI, 9.6-11.1 vs. 2.3%; 95% CI, 2.2-2.4); and all women 25 years and older that were HPV-positive (18.5%; 95% CI, 17.8-19.2 vs. 4.3%; 95% CI, 4.2-4.4).
Conclusion: The cobas and LA results show excellent agreement. The data support HPV16 typing.
Impact: HPV16 typing is useful in the management of HPV-positive/cytology-negative women in cotesting, of all HPV-positive women in primary HPV testing, and perhaps in the management of HPV-positive women with ASC-US. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 24(9); 1304-10.
©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest Statement: The NCI authors have conducted studies in which HPV testing was performed at no cost by Roche Molecular Systems or BD. The Roche Molecular Systems authors are or were employees of the company during the investigation. The analyses were conducted and the manuscript was written by the corresponding author; all authors suggested editorial changes but the final decisions were made by the corresponding author. The manuscript was approved by all authors.
Comment in
-
HPV Genotyping in the Prevention of Cervical Cancer-How and When Can It Be a Useful Marker?Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Sep;24(9):1302-3. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0591. Epub 2015 Jun 18. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015. PMID: 26088704 No abstract available.
References
-
- Stoler MH, Castle PE, Solomon D, Schiffman M. The expanded use of HPV testing in gynecologic practice per ASCCP-guided management requires the use of well-validated assays. Am J Clin Pathol. 2007;127:335–7. - PubMed
-
- Isidean SD, Coutlee F, Franco EL. cobas 4800 HPV Test, a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for the detection of human papillomavirus in cervical specimens. Expert review of molecular diagnostics. 2014;14:5–16. - PubMed
-
- Bouvard V, Baan R, Straif K, Grosse Y, Secretan B, El Ghissassi F, et al. A review of human carcinogens--Part B: biological agents. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:321–2. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
