Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec;99(12):1628-33.
doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-306683. Epub 2015 Jun 18.

Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in individuals with type 2 diabetes who had recorded diabetic retinopathy from retinal photographs in Catalonia (Spain)

Affiliations

Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in individuals with type 2 diabetes who had recorded diabetic retinopathy from retinal photographs in Catalonia (Spain)

Antonio Rodriguez-Poncelas et al. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015 Dec.

Abstract

Background/aims: Retinal photography with a non-mydriatic camera is the method currently employed for diabetic retinography (DR) screening. We designed this study in order to evaluate the prevalence and severity of DR, and associated risk factors, in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) screened in Catalan Primary Health Care.

Methods: Retrospective, cross-sectional, population based study performed in Catalonia (Spain) with patients with T2DM, aged between 30 years and 90 years (on 31 December 2012) screened with retinal photography and whose DR category was recorded in their medical records. DR was classified as: no apparent retinopathy (no DR), mild non-proliferative DR (mild NPDR), moderate NPDR, severe NPDR, proliferative DR (PDR) and diabetic macular oedema (DMO). Non-vision threatening DR (non-VTDR) included mild and moderate NPDR; VTDR included severe NPDR, PDR and DMO. Clinical data were obtained retrospectively from the SIDIAP database (System for Research and Development in Primary Care).

Results: 108 723 patients with T2DM had been screened with retinal photography. The prevalence of any kind of DR was 12.3% (95% CI 12.1% to 12.5%). Non-VTDR and VTDR were present in 10.8% (mild 7.5% and moderate NPDR 3.3%) and 1.4% (severe NPDR 0.86%, PDR 0.36% and DMO 0.18%) of the study patients, respectively.

Conclusions: The prevalence of any type of DR in patients with T2DM screened with retinal photography was lower when compared with earlier studies.

Keywords: Epidemiology; Retina; Telemedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy.

References

    1. Fong DS, Aiello L, Gardner TW, et al. . American Diabetes Association. Retinopathy in diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004;27(Suppl 1):S84–7. 10.2337/diacare.27.2007.S84 - DOI - PubMed
    1. ACCORD Study Group. Diabetic retinopathy, its progression, and incident cardiovascular events in the ACCORD trial. Diabetes Care 2013;36:1266–71. 10.2337/dc12-1311 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kempen JH, O'Colmain BJ, Leske MC, et al. . Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:552–63. 10.1001/archopht.122.4.552 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yau JW, Rogers SL, Kawasaki R, et al. . Meta-Analysis for Eye Disease (META-EYE) Study Group. Global prevalence and major risk factors of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care 2012;35:556–64. 10.2337/dc11-1909 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wong TY, Klein R, Islam FM, et al. . Diabetic retinopathy in a multi-ethnic cohort in the United States. AmJ Ophthalmol 2006;141:446–55. 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.08.063 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms