Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Jun;22(3):e183-215.
doi: 10.3747/co.22.2566.

Use of the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, dacomitinib, and icotinib in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review

Affiliations
Review

Use of the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, dacomitinib, and icotinib in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review

P M Ellis et al. Curr Oncol. 2015 Jun.

Abstract

Introduction: This systematic review addresses the use of epidermal growth factor receptor (egfr) inhibitors in three populations of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc) patients-unselected, selected, and molecularly selected-in three treatment settings: first line, second line, and maintenance.

Methods: Ninety-six randomized controlled trials found using the medline and embase databases form the basis of this review.

Results: In the first-line setting, data about the efficacy of egfr tyrosine kinase inhibitors (tkis) compared with platinum-based chemotherapy are inconsistent. Results from studies that selected patients based on clinical characteristics are also mixed. There is high-quality evidence that an egfrtki is preferred over a platinum doublet as initial therapy for patients with an activating mutation of the EGFR gene. The egfrtkis are associated with a higher likelihood of response, longer progression-free survival, and improved quality of life. Multiple trials of second-line therapy have compared an egfrtki with chemotherapy. Meta-analysis of those data demonstrates similar progression-free and overall survival. There is consequently no preferred sequence for second-line egfrtki or second-line chemotherapy. The egfrtkis have also been evaluated as switch-maintenance therapy. No molecular marker could identify patients in whom a survival benefit was not observed; however, the magnitude of the benefit was modest.

Conclusions: Determination of EGFR mutation status is essential to making appropriate treatment decisions in patients with nsclc. Patients who are EGFR mutation-positive should be treated with an egfrtki as first-line therapy. An egfrtki is still appropriate therapy in patients who are EGFR wild-type, but the selected agent should be administered as second- or third-line therapy.

Keywords: Non-small-small cell lung cancer; egfr inhibitors; mutation status; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
(A) Meta-analysis of progression-free survival, comparing epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors with chemotherapy in molecularly selected patients. (B) Meta-analysis of progression-free survival, comparing epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors with chemotherapy in molecularly selected patients, including those in the IPASS and First-SIGNAL trials. SE = standard error; IV = inverse variance; CI = confidence interval.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
(A) Meta-analysis of overall survival, comparing epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors with chemotherapy in molecularly selected patients. (B) Meta-analysis of overall survival, comparing epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors with chemotherapy in molecularly selected patients, including those in the IPASS and First-SIGNAL trials. SE = standard error; IV = inverse variance; CI = confidence interval.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
(A) Meta-analysis of progression-free survival, comparing epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors with chemotherapy in second-line unselected patients. (B) Meta-analysis of overall survival, comparing epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors with chemotherapy in second-line unselected patients. SE = standard error; IV = inverse variance; CI = confidence interval.

References

    1. Scagliotti GV, Parikh P, von Pawel J, et al. Phase iii study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3543–51. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.0375. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belani CP, et al. on behalf of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:92–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011954. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hanna N, Shepherd FA, Fossella FV, et al. Randomized phase iii trial of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:1589–97. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.163. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fossella FV, DeVore R, Kerr RN, et al. Randomized phase iii trial of docetaxel versus vinorelbine or ifosfamide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens. The tax 320 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:2354–62. [Erratum in: J Clin Oncol 2004;22:209] - PubMed
    1. Shepherd FA, Dancey J, Ramlau R, et al. Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus best supportive care in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:2095–103. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources