Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2015 Aug;58(4):1306-18.
doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0311.

Relations Among Children's Use of Dialect and Literacy Skills: A Meta-Analysis

Meta-Analysis

Relations Among Children's Use of Dialect and Literacy Skills: A Meta-Analysis

Brandy Gatlin et al. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: The current meta-analysis examines recent empirical research studies that have investigated relations among dialect use and the development and achievement of reading, spelling, and writing skills.

Method: Studies published between 1998 and 2014 were selected if they: (a) included participants who were in Grades K-6 and were typically developing native English speakers, (b) examined a concurrent quantitative relationship between dialect use and literacy, including reading, spelling, or writing measures, and (c) contained sufficient information to calculate effect size estimates.

Results: Upon the removal of one study that was found to be an outlier, the full sample included 19 studies consisting of 1,947 participants, of which the majority (70%) were African American. The results showed a negative and moderate relationship between dialect use and overall literacy performance (M effect size = -0.33) and for dialect and reading (M effect size = -0.32). For spelling and writing, the relationship was negative and small (M effect size = -0.22). Moderator analyses revealed that socioeconomic status and grade level were not significant predictors for relations among dialect use and literacy skills.

Conclusions: Implications for practice and future research, including analyzing dialect use in a variety of contexts and examining these relations to literacy outcomes, are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Adams M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    1. *Apel K., & Thomas-Tate S. (2009). Morphological awareness skills of fourth-grade African American students. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40, 312–324. - PubMed
    1. Artiles A. J., Kozleski E. B., Trent S. C., Osher D., & Ortiz A. (2010). Justifying and explaining disproportionality, 1968–2008: A critique of underlying views of culture. Exceptional Children, 76, 279–299.
    1. Barratt W. (2006). The Barratt simplified measure of social status (BSMSS). Unpublished manuscript, Indiana State University, Terre Haute, IN.
    1. Becker B. J. (2000). Multivariate meta-analysis. In Tinsley H. E. A. & Brown S. D. (Eds.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 499–525). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources