Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar;30(3):807-18.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4279-6. Epub 2015 Jun 20.

Avoiding colorectal resection for polyps: is CELS the best method?

Affiliations

Avoiding colorectal resection for polyps: is CELS the best method?

Kentaro Nakajima et al. Surg Endosc. 2016 Mar.

Abstract

Background: A significant proportion of colonic polyps are unsuitable for endoscopic removal. A combined endoscopic and laparoscopic approach is an alternative to conventional polypectomy or resection. In this review, we set out to determine whether avoiding segmental resection for benign colonic polyps was a viable option through combined endolaparoscopic surgery (CELS). We examined the methods and classification criteria different centers employed in their reporting. Finally, we determined whether CELS and procedures methodically similar should be considered as the standard of care today.

Methods: A systematic review was performed reporting the outcomes of CELS for benign colorectal polyps. Main outcomes measured included operating time, length of hospital stay and postoperative complications. The CELS data from reports with a larger number of polyps examined were compared to data from representative EMR, ESD and laparoscopic colectomy literature.

Results: Eighteen eligible studies with 532 patients were included. We identified three different CELS techniques: EMR, ESD and full-thickness excision. The operative time for CELS reported in 12 studies varied from 45 to 205 min. The successful endoscopic resection rate ranged from 58 to 100%. Conversion to open surgery was reported in <5%. The length of hospital stay varied from 0 to 7 days. Overall postoperative complications ranged from 0 to 18%. The reports of CELS with more than 20 polyps presented 74-91% successful rate. In comparison with laparoscopic group, CELS groups showed shorter operation time (92-145 vs 125-199 min) and length of hospital stay (1-1.5 vs 4-11 days).

Conclusions: CELS and similar procedures are viable options for intestinal polyps removal. Moving forward, we suggest methods to standardize CELS procedure reporting. The reported outcomes of CELS indicate that it should be seen as a viable alternative to segmental resection when endoscopic methods alone do not suffice.

Keywords: Colon; Endoscopy; Laparoscopy; Polypectomy; Surgery; Technique.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Surg Endosc. 2007 Sep;21(9):1650-3 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 2014 Sep;28(9):2641-8 - PubMed
    1. JSLS. 2009 Oct-Dec;13(4):555-9 - PubMed
    1. Dig Endosc. 2013 Mar;25 Suppl 1:64-70 - PubMed
    1. Colorectal Dis. 2011 Nov;13(11):1280-4 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources