Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Sep;22(9):1138-46.
doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.03.018. Epub 2015 Jun 18.

Low-volume contrast medium protocol for comprehensive cardiac and aortoiliac CT assessment in the context of transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Affiliations

Low-volume contrast medium protocol for comprehensive cardiac and aortoiliac CT assessment in the context of transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Lucas L Geyer et al. Acad Radiol. 2015 Sep.

Abstract

Rationale and objectives: To investigate the diagnostic performance of a comprehensive computed tomography (CT) protocol for both cardiac and aortoiliac evaluation of patients considered for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using a single, low-volume contrast medium (CM) injection.

Materials and methods: Forty-four TAVR candidates were retrospectively analyzed. All underwent retrospectively electrocardiogram-gated cardiac CT followed by high-pitch CT angiography of the aortoiliac vasculature using one of two single injection protocols of 320 mgI/mL iodine CM: group A (n = 22), iodine delivery rate-based (1.28 gI/s), 60-mL CM volume, 4.0 mL/s flow rate; group B (n = 22), clinical routine protocol, 100-mL CM volume, 4.0 mL/s flow rate. Mean arterial attenuation, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. Subjective image quality was assessed.

Results: Aortic root and iliofemoral dimensions could be analyzed in all cases. Patient characteristics showed no significant differences. Mean attenuation at the levels of the aortic root (285.8 ± 83.0 HU vs 327.5 ± 70.8 HU, P = .080) and the iliofemoral access route (256.8 ± 88.5 HU vs 307.5 ± 93.2 HU, P = .071), as well as SNR and CNR were nonsignificantly lower in group A compared to group B. Subjective image quality was equivalent.

Conclusions: In multimorbid TAVR patients, the performance of a combined CT protocol using a single low-volume CM bolus is feasible with maintained image quality compared to a standard protocol.

Keywords: Aortic stenosis; aortoiliac CT angiography; contrast medium; dual-source CT; transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms