Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Aug 27;373(9):823-33.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1501035. Epub 2015 Jun 22.

Perioperative Bridging Anticoagulation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Perioperative Bridging Anticoagulation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

James D Douketis et al. N Engl J Med. .

Abstract

Background: It is uncertain whether bridging anticoagulation is necessary for patients with atrial fibrillation who need an interruption in warfarin treatment for an elective operation or other elective invasive procedure. We hypothesized that forgoing bridging anticoagulation would be noninferior to bridging with low-molecular-weight heparin for the prevention of perioperative arterial thromboembolism and would be superior to bridging with respect to major bleeding.

Methods: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in which, after perioperative interruption of warfarin therapy, patients were randomly assigned to receive bridging anticoagulation therapy with low-molecular-weight heparin (100 IU of dalteparin per kilogram of body weight) or matching placebo administered subcutaneously twice daily, from 3 days before the procedure until 24 hours before the procedure and then for 5 to 10 days after the procedure. Warfarin treatment was stopped 5 days before the procedure and was resumed within 24 hours after the procedure. Follow-up of patients continued for 30 days after the procedure. The primary outcomes were arterial thromboembolism (stroke, systemic embolism, or transient ischemic attack) and major bleeding.

Results: In total, 1884 patients were enrolled, with 950 assigned to receive no bridging therapy and 934 assigned to receive bridging therapy. The incidence of arterial thromboembolism was 0.4% in the no-bridging group and 0.3% in the bridging group (risk difference, 0.1 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.6 to 0.8; P=0.01 for noninferiority). The incidence of major bleeding was 1.3% in the no-bridging group and 3.2% in the bridging group (relative risk, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.78; P=0.005 for superiority).

Conclusions: In patients with atrial fibrillation who had warfarin treatment interrupted for an elective operation or other elective invasive procedure, forgoing bridging anticoagulation was noninferior to perioperative bridging with low-molecular-weight heparin for the prevention of arterial thromboembolism and decreased the risk of major bleeding. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health; BRIDGE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00786474.).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. BRIDGE Study Design
Screening visits occurred between 30 days and 5 days before the planned procedure, and randomization (R) occurred 5 days before the procedure. Warfarin treatment was discontinued 5 days before the procedure, and administration of the study drug was initiated 3 days before the procedure. It was recommended that the international normalized ratio (INR) be measured 1 day before the procedure; if the INR was greater than 1.8, oral vitamin K (1.0 to 2.5 mg) was recommended; if the INR was 1.5 to 1.8, oral vitamin K was optional. If the procedure or surgery was delayed up to 3 days, administration of the study drug was continued until 24 hours before the procedure. Warfarin treatment was restarted on the evening of or the day after the procedure, and the study drug was restarted 12 to 24 hours after a minor (or low-bleeding-risk) procedure and 48 to 72 hours after a major (or high-bleeding-risk) procedure. Administration of the study drug was continued after the procedure until the INR was 2.0 or higher on one occasion. The final patient follow-up occurred 30 days after the procedure. LMWH denotes low-molecular-weight heparin.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Screening, Randomization, and Follow-up.

Comment in

References

    1. Kearon C, Hirsh J. Management of anticoagulation before and after elective surgery. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:1506–11. - PubMed
    1. Piazza G, Goldhaber SZ. Periprocedural management of the chronically anticoagulated patient: critical pathways for bridging therapy. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2003;2:96–103. - PubMed
    1. Gallego P, Apostolakis S, Lip GY. Bridging evidence-based practice and practice-based evidence in periprocedural anticoagulation. Circulation. 2012;126:1573–6. - PubMed
    1. Healey JS, Eikelboom J, Douketis J, et al. Periprocedural bleeding and thromboembolic events with dabigatran compared with warfarin: results from the Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY) randomized trial. Circulation. 2012;126:343–8. Erratum, Circulation 2012;126(10):e160. - PubMed
    1. Garcia D, Alexander JH, Wallentin L, et al. Management and clinical outcomes in patients treated with apixaban vs warfarin undergoing procedures. Blood. 2014;124:3692–8. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data