Ovarian cancer treatment: The end of empiricism?
- PMID: 26096019
- PMCID: PMC4744728
- DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29481
Ovarian cancer treatment: The end of empiricism?
Abstract
The diagnosis, investigation, and management of ovarian cancer are in a state of flux-balancing ever rapid advances in our understanding of its biology with 3 decades of clinical trials. Clinical trials that started with empirically driven selections have evolved in an evidence-informed manner to gradually improve outcome. Has this improved understanding of the biology and associated calls to action led to appropriate changes in therapy? In this review, the authors discuss incorporating emerging data on biology, combinations, dose, and scheduling of new and existing agents with patient preferences in the management of women with ovarian cancer.
Keywords: biology; biomarkers; ovarian cancer; strategy; treatment.
© 2015 The Authors. American Cancer Society.
Figures
References
-
- Jayson GC, Kohn EC, Kitchener HC, Ledermann JA. Ovarian cancer. Lancet. 2014;384:1376‐1388. - PubMed
-
- Muggia FM, Braly PS, Brady MF, et al. Phase III randomized study of cisplatin versus paclitaxel versus cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with suboptimal stage III or IV ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:106‐115. - PubMed
-
- Piccart MJ, Bertelsen K, James K, et al. Randomized intergroup trial of cisplatin‐paclitaxel versus cisplatin‐cyclophosphamide in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: 3‐year results. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:699‐708. - PubMed
-
- Friedlander ML, Stockler MR, Butow P, et al. Clinical trials of palliative chemotherapy in platinum‐resistant or ‐refractory ovarian cancer: time to think differently [letter]? J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:2362. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
