Clinical criteria to screen for inpatient diagnostic errors: a scoping review
- PMID: 26097801
- PMCID: PMC4474234
- DOI: 10.1515/dx-2014-0047
Clinical criteria to screen for inpatient diagnostic errors: a scoping review
Abstract
Diagnostic errors are common and costly, but difficult to detect. "Trigger" tools have promise to facilitate detection, but have not been applied specifically for inpatient diagnostic error. We performed a scoping review to collate all individual "trigger" criteria that have been developed or validated that may indicate that an inpatient diagnostic error has occurred. We searched three databases and screened 8568 titles and abstracts to ultimately include 33 articles. We also developed a conceptual framework of diagnostic error outcomes using real clinical scenarios, and used it to categorize the extracted criteria. Of the multiple criteria we found related to inpatient diagnostic error and amenable to automated detection, the most common were death, transfer to a higher level of care, arrest or "code", and prolonged length of hospital stay. Several others, such as abrupt stoppage of multiple medications or change in procedure, may also be useful. Validation for general adverse event detection was done in 15 studies, but only one performed validation for diagnostic error specifically. Automated detection was used in only two studies. These criteria may be useful for developing diagnostic error detection tools.
Keywords: adverse event detection; diagnostic error detection; trigger tools.
Similar articles
-
Definitions and Measurements for Atypical Presentations at Risk for Diagnostic Errors in Internal Medicine: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Mar 25;13:e56933. doi: 10.2196/56933. JMIR Res Protoc. 2024. PMID: 38526541 Free PMC article.
-
Trigger Tool-Based Automated Adverse Event Detection in Electronic Health Records: Systematic Review.J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 30;20(5):e198. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9901. J Med Internet Res. 2018. PMID: 29848467 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
Multi-detector computed tomography angiography for coronary artery disease: an evidence-based analysis.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2005;5(5):1-57. Epub 2005 Apr 1. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2005. PMID: 23074474 Free PMC article.
-
What is the epidemiology of medication errors, error-related adverse events and risk factors for errors in adults managed in community care contexts? A systematic review of the international literature.BMJ Open. 2018 May 5;8(5):e019101. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019101. BMJ Open. 2018. PMID: 29730617 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Application of electronic trigger tools to identify targets for improving diagnostic safety.BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Feb;28(2):151-159. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008086. Epub 2018 Oct 5. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019. PMID: 30291180 Free PMC article.
-
Cerebrovascular disease hospitalizations following emergency department headache visits: A nested case-control study.Acad Emerg Med. 2022 Jan;29(1):41-50. doi: 10.1111/acem.14353. Epub 2021 Aug 18. Acad Emerg Med. 2022. PMID: 34309135 Free PMC article.
-
Self-Cognizant Bionic Liquid Sensor for Pathogen Diagnosis.Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2021 Sep 15;2021:9861513. doi: 10.34133/2021/9861513. eCollection 2021. Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2021. PMID: 36285143 Free PMC article.
-
Measuring diagnostic safety of inpatients: time to set sail in uncharted waters.Diagnosis (Berl). 2015 Feb;2(1):1-2. doi: 10.1515/dx-2015-0003. Epub 2015 Feb 4. Diagnosis (Berl). 2015. PMID: 26955511 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
An electronic trigger based on care escalation to identify preventable adverse events in hospitalised patients.BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Mar;27(3):241-246. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006975. Epub 2017 Sep 21. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018. PMID: 28935832 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Graber M. Diagnostic errors in medicine: a case of neglect. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2005;31:106–13. - PubMed
-
- Zwaan L, de Bruijne M, Wagner C, Thijs A, Smits M, van der Wal G, et al. Patient record review of the incidence, consequences, and causes of diagnostic adverse events. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:1015–21. - PubMed
-
- Leape L, Berwick D, Bates D. Counting deaths due to medical errors-Reply. J Am Med Asssoc. 2002;288:2404–5.
-
- Mangalmurti SS, Harold JG, Parikh PD, Flannery FT, Oetgen WJ. Characteristics of medical professional liability claims against internists. J Am Med Assoc Intern Med. 2014;174:993–5. - PubMed
-
- Saber Tehrani AS, Lee H, Mathews SC, Shore A, Makary MA, Pronovost PJ, et al. 25-Year summary of US malpractice claims for diagnostic errors 1986–2010: an analysis from the National Practitioner Data Bank. Br Med J Qual Saf. 2013;22:672–80. - PubMed
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources