Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Feb;2(1):3-19.
doi: 10.1515/dx-2014-0047.

Clinical criteria to screen for inpatient diagnostic errors: a scoping review

Affiliations

Clinical criteria to screen for inpatient diagnostic errors: a scoping review

Edna C Shenvi et al. Diagnosis (Berl). 2015 Feb.

Abstract

Diagnostic errors are common and costly, but difficult to detect. "Trigger" tools have promise to facilitate detection, but have not been applied specifically for inpatient diagnostic error. We performed a scoping review to collate all individual "trigger" criteria that have been developed or validated that may indicate that an inpatient diagnostic error has occurred. We searched three databases and screened 8568 titles and abstracts to ultimately include 33 articles. We also developed a conceptual framework of diagnostic error outcomes using real clinical scenarios, and used it to categorize the extracted criteria. Of the multiple criteria we found related to inpatient diagnostic error and amenable to automated detection, the most common were death, transfer to a higher level of care, arrest or "code", and prolonged length of hospital stay. Several others, such as abrupt stoppage of multiple medications or change in procedure, may also be useful. Validation for general adverse event detection was done in 15 studies, but only one performed validation for diagnostic error specifically. Automated detection was used in only two studies. These criteria may be useful for developing diagnostic error detection tools.

Keywords: adverse event detection; diagnostic error detection; trigger tools.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Article selection.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Graber M. Diagnostic errors in medicine: a case of neglect. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2005;31:106–13. - PubMed
    1. Zwaan L, de Bruijne M, Wagner C, Thijs A, Smits M, van der Wal G, et al. Patient record review of the incidence, consequences, and causes of diagnostic adverse events. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:1015–21. - PubMed
    1. Leape L, Berwick D, Bates D. Counting deaths due to medical errors-Reply. J Am Med Asssoc. 2002;288:2404–5.
    1. Mangalmurti SS, Harold JG, Parikh PD, Flannery FT, Oetgen WJ. Characteristics of medical professional liability claims against internists. J Am Med Assoc Intern Med. 2014;174:993–5. - PubMed
    1. Saber Tehrani AS, Lee H, Mathews SC, Shore A, Makary MA, Pronovost PJ, et al. 25-Year summary of US malpractice claims for diagnostic errors 1986–2010: an analysis from the National Practitioner Data Bank. Br Med J Qual Saf. 2013;22:672–80. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources