Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2015 Aug;175(8):1378-87.
doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2609.

Urinary Incontinence Before and After Bariatric Surgery

Affiliations
Observational Study

Urinary Incontinence Before and After Bariatric Surgery

Leslee L Subak et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Aug.

Abstract

Importance: Among women and men with severe obesity, evidence for improvement in urinary incontinence beyond the first year after bariatric surgery-induced weight loss is lacking.

Objectives: To examine change in urinary incontinence before and after bariatric surgery and to identify factors associated with improvement and remission among women and men in the first 3 years after bariatric surgery.

Design, setting, and participants: The Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery 2 is an observational cohort study at 10 US hospitals in 6 geographically diverse clinical centers. Participants were recruited between February 21, 2005, and February 17, 2009. Adults undergoing first-time bariatric surgical procedures as part of clinical care by participating surgeons between March 14, 2006, and April 24, 2009, were followed up for 3 years (through October 24, 2012).

Intervention: Participants undergoing bariatric surgery completed research assessments before the procedure and annually thereafter.

Main outcomes and measures: The frequency and type of urinary incontinence episodes in the past 3 months were assessed using a validated questionnaire. Prevalent urinary incontinence was defined as at least weekly urinary incontinence episodes, and remission was defined as change from prevalent urinary incontinence at baseline to less than weekly urinary incontinence episodes at follow-up.

Results: Of 2458 participants, 1987 (80.8%) completed baseline and follow-up assessments. At baseline, the median age was 47 years (age range, 18-78 years), the median body mass index was 46 kg/m2 (range, 34-94 kg/m2), and 1565 of 1987 (78.8%) were women. Urinary incontinence was more prevalent among women (49.3%; 95% CI, 46.9%-51.9%) than men (21.8%; 95% CI, 18.2%-26.1%) (P < .001). After a mean 1-year weight loss of 29.5% (95% CI, 29.0%-30.1%) in women and 27.0% (95% CI, 25.9%-28.6%) in men, year 1 urinary incontinence prevalence was significantly lower among women (18.3%; 95% CI, 16.4%-20.4%) and men (9.8%; 95% CI, 7.2%-13.4%) (P < .001 for all). The 3-year prevalence was higher than the 1-year prevalence for both sexes (24.8%; 95% CI, 21.8%-26.5% among women and 12.2%; 95% CI, 9.0%-16.4% among men) but was substantially lower than baseline (P < .001 for all). Weight loss was independently related to urinary incontinence remission (relative risk, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.06-1.10 in women and 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.13 in men) per 5% weight loss, as were younger age and the absence of a severe walking limitation.

Conclusions and relevance: Among women and men with severe obesity, bariatric surgery was associated with substantially reduced urinary incontinence over 3 years. Improvement in urinary incontinence may be an important benefit of bariatric surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Study Participant Flow Diagram
Figure 2
Figure 2. Modeled Frequency of Urinary Incontinence Episodes and Prevalence of Any-Type, Stress-Type, and Urgency-Type Urinary Incontinence Before and After Bariatric Surgery
Each follow-up time point was compared with baseline. Bars indicate 95% CIs. a The overall P value for a time effect of change in prevalence of stress urinary incontinence among men was 0.31 so pairwise comparisons were not made.

Comment in

References

    1. Markland AD, Richter HE, Fwu CW, Eggers P, Kusek JW. Prevalence and trends of urinary incontinence in adults in the United States, 2001 to 2008. J Urol. 2011;186(2):589–593. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thom DH, Van Den Eeden SK, Ragins AI, et al. Differences in prevalence of urinary incontinence by race/ethnicity. J Urol. 2006;175(1):259–264. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buckley BS, Lapitan MC. Epidemiology Committee of the Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence, Paris 2008. Prevalence of urinary incontinence in men, women, and children: current evidence: findings of the Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence. Urology. 2010;76(2):265–270. - PubMed
    1. Grimby A, Milsom I, Molander U, Wiklund I, Ekelund P. The influence of urinary incontinence on the quality of life of elderly women. Age Ageing. 1993;22(2):82–89. - PubMed
    1. Huang AJ, Brown JS, Kanaya AM, et al. Quality-of-life impact and treatment of urinary incontinence in ethnically diverse older women. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(18):2000–2006. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms