Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Oct;44(1):39-45.
doi: 10.1007/s10840-015-0026-0. Epub 2015 Jun 23.

Usefulness of intracardiac echocardiography during pulmonary vein isolation with the novel multipolar irrigated ablation catheter (nMARQ™)

Affiliations

Usefulness of intracardiac echocardiography during pulmonary vein isolation with the novel multipolar irrigated ablation catheter (nMARQ™)

Antonio Dello Russo et al. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Previous studies reported the usefulness of an irrigated circular radiofrequency ablation catheter (nMARQ(TM), Biosense Webster) for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). We evaluated the role of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) to optimize the manipulation of nMARQ(TM) catheter.

Methods: Thirty-seven patients (pts), (mean age 55 ± 12 years; 28 males) were enrolled to perform PVI. All pts underwent PVI with the nMARQ(TM) catheter. In 20 pts (group 1), we utilized ICE to guide nMARQ(TM) catheter positioning at the PV ostia; in the other 17 pts (group 2), nMARQ(TM) catheter was positioned at the PV ostia guided by fluoroscopy and TissueConnect(TM) technology.

Results: Radiofrequency (RF) applications were significantly lower in group 1 compared to group 2 [left PVs: 6 (range 3 to 12) in group 1 and 12 (range 5 to 16) in group 2 (p < 0.001); right PVs: 7 (range 4 to 14) in group 1 and 10 (range 5 to 16) in group 2 (p = 0.04)]; similarly regarding the time of RF delivery [left PVs: 318 ± 194 s in group 1 vs. 542 ± 104 s in group 2 (p < 0.001); right PVs: 410 ± 270 s in group 1 vs. 550 ± 156 s in group 2 (p = 0.05)]. Fluoroscopy time (23 ± 9 min vs. 28 ± 5 min; p = 0.05), procedural time (83 ± 23 min vs. 160 ± 42 min; p < 0.001), and radiation dose (109 ± 20 Gy/cm(2) vs. 127 ± 29 Gy/cm(2); p = 0.04) were significantly lower in group 1 compared to group 2.

Conclusion: ICE might be a useful tool to guide nMARQ(TM) catheter position in the left atrium during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures.

Keywords: Atrial fibrillation ablation; Intracardiac echocardiography; nMARQTM ablation catheter.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Europace. 2013 Mar;15(3):332-8 - PubMed
    1. Heart Rhythm. 2014 Mar;11(3):375-83 - PubMed
    1. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014 Apr;25(4):339-45 - PubMed
    1. Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 9;168(4):3721-7 - PubMed
    1. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2011 Aug;31(2):109-18 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources