Can Good Infection Control Be Obtained in One-stage Exchange of the Infected TKA to a Rotating Hinge Design? 10-year Results
- PMID: 26100256
- PMCID: PMC4686525
- DOI: 10.1007/s11999-015-4408-5
Can Good Infection Control Be Obtained in One-stage Exchange of the Infected TKA to a Rotating Hinge Design? 10-year Results
Abstract
Background: Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) occurs in 1% to 2% of total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). Although two-stage exchange is the preferred management method of patients with chronic PJI in TKA in North America, one-stage exchange is an alternative treatment method, but long-term studies of this approach have not been conducted.
Questions/purposes: We reviewed our minimum 9-year results of 70 patients who underwent one-stage exchange arthroplasty with a rotating hinge design to determine: (1) What was the proportion of patients free of infection? (2) What was the patient rate of survival free of any reoperation? (3) What were the clinical outcomes as measured by Hospital for Special Surgery scores? (4) What proportion of patients developed radiographic evidence of loosening?
Methods: All one-stage revision TKAs for infection between January 1 and December 31, 2002, with a minimum 9-year followup (mean, 10 years; range, 9-11 years), in which patients had been seen within the last 1 year, were included in this retrospective review. During that period, 11 patients with infected TKAs were treated with other approaches (including two-stage approaches in eight); the general indication for one-stage revision was the diagnosis of PJI with a known causative organism. Exclusion criteria were culture-negative preoperative aspiration, known allergy to local antibiotics or bone cement, or cases in which radical débridement was impossible as a result of the involvement of important anatomical structures. Eighty-one patients with PJI were seen during this period; 70 underwent one-stage exchange using our strict protocol and were reimplanted with a rotating hinge TKA. Eleven patients (15.7%) were lost to followup. Hospital for Special Surgery scores were recorded and all radiographs were evaluated for prosthetic loosening. Failure was defined as revision surgery for infection or any other cause.
Results: Our 10-year infection-free survival was 93% (mean, 4.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 89%-96%; p < 0.007); and the patient 10-year survival rate free of revision for other causes was 91% (mean, 5.2; 95% CI, 86%-95%; p < 0.002). Mean Hospital for Special Surgery knee score at last followup was 69.6 (± 22.5 SD; range, 22-100) and the mean improvement in Hospital for Special Surgery knee score from preoperative to most recent followup was 35 (± 24.2 SD; range, 13-99). Evidence of radiographic loosening was seen in 11 patients at last followup, whereby in six patients, there was need for revision surgery.
Conclusions: Our study results showed an overall infection control rate of 93% and good clinical results using our one-stage approach, which combines aggressive débridement of the collateral ligaments and posterior capsule with a rotating hinge implant. These results are comparable with two-stage techniques at a followup of 10 years; further research into one-stage exchange techniques for PJI in TKA appears warranted.
Level of evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.
Similar articles
-
What Is the Mid-term Survivorship of Infected Rotating-hinge Implants Treated with One-stage-exchange?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Dec 1;479(12):2714-2722. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001868. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021. PMID: 34153008 Free PMC article.
-
Infection After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A High Risk of Subsequent Complications.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Jan;477(1):70-77. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000372. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019. PMID: 30794230 Free PMC article.
-
Is single-stage revision according to a strict protocol effective in treatment of chronic knee arthroplasty infections?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jan;473(1):8-14. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3721-8. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015. PMID: 24923669 Free PMC article.
-
[Revision surgery in acute periprosthetic knee joint infections].Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2018 Oct;30(5):309-320. doi: 10.1007/s00064-018-0558-4. Epub 2018 Jul 27. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2018. PMID: 30054644 Review. German.
-
[Comparison of therapeutic strategies for hip and knee prosthetic joint infection].Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2009 Aug;76(4):302-9. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2009. PMID: 19755054 Review. Czech.
Cited by
-
Periprosthetic Knee Infection - Part 2: Treatment.Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2022 May 27;57(2):193-199. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1729936. eCollection 2022 Apr. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2022. PMID: 35652024 Free PMC article.
-
Rotating hinge knee versus constrained condylar knee in revision total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2019 Mar 25;14(3):e0214279. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214279. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 30908538 Free PMC article.
-
Microbiology of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infections in Surgically Revised Cases from 34 Centers in Mainland China.Infect Drug Resist. 2021 Jun 25;14:2411-2418. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S305205. eCollection 2021. Infect Drug Resist. 2021. PMID: 34211286 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment options in PJI - is two-stage still gold standard?J Orthop. 2021 Jan 20;23:180-184. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.12.021. eCollection 2021 Jan-Feb. J Orthop. 2021. PMID: 33551610 Free PMC article.
-
Periprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI).Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2025;13(7):406-413. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2025.81816.3726. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2025. PMID: 40787294 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Buechel FF, Femino FP, D’Alessio J. Primary exchange revision arthroplasty for infected total knee replacement: a long-term study. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2004;33:190–198. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials