Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 May;7(5):799-809.
doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.04.46.

Meta-analysis of the diagnostic yield and safety of electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy for lung nodules

Affiliations

Meta-analysis of the diagnostic yield and safety of electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy for lung nodules

Weisan Zhang et al. J Thorac Dis. 2015 May.

Abstract

Objective: This meta-analysis is to evaluate the overall diagnostic yield and accuracy of electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB)-based targeted biopsies in detecting peripheral lesions.

Methods: A systematic search in PubMed was performed using "electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy" crossed with "peripheral lesions" and "lung nodules". Test performance characteristics with the use of forest plots, summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROCs) and bivariate random effects were summarized using Meta-Disc software. Adverse events and complications were recorded if reported.

Results: A total of 17 studies (1,106 patients with peripheral lung lesions) were included in this analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratios (PLRs), negative likelihood ratios (NLRs), and diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) of ENB was 82%, 100%, 19.36, 0.23, and 97.62, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) for the SROC was 0.9786. No procedure-related complication was found.

Conclusions: ENB is an effective and safe procedure in diagnosing peripheral lung lesions.

Keywords: Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB); diagnostic yield; lung nodules; meta-analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot for sensitivity (A) and specificity (B).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot for positive likelihood ratio (A) and negative likelihood ratio (B).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot for diagnostic odds ratio.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The summary receiver operating characteristic curve.

References

    1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2012;62:10-29. - PubMed
    1. Molina JR, Yang P, Cassivi SD, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer: epidemiology, risk factors, treatment, and survivorship. Mayo Clin Proc 2008;83:584-94. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Flehinger BJ, Kimmel M, Melamed MR. The effect of surgical treatment on survival from early lung cancer. Implications for screening. Chest 1992;101:1013-8. - PubMed
    1. Swensen SJ, Jett JR, Hartman TE, et al. CT screening for lung cancer: five-year prospective experience. Radiology 2005;235:259-65. - PubMed
    1. Weiser TS, Hyman K, Yun J, et al. Electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy: a surgeon's perspective. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85:S797-801. - PubMed