Quantifying difference in gene expression profile between bovine blastocysts derived by in vitro fertilization and somatic cell nuclear transfer
- PMID: 26101995
- DOI: 10.1016/j.gep.2015.05.005
Quantifying difference in gene expression profile between bovine blastocysts derived by in vitro fertilization and somatic cell nuclear transfer
Abstract
Epigenetic reprogramming intensely occurs in somatic-cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) embryos, which highlights the importance of proper expressions of reprogramming-related genes in SCNT embryos. We here assessed gene expression profiles (GEPs) difference between bovine blastocyst groups derived by in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or SCNT; in SCNT, cumulus cells and ear skin fibroblasts were used for cSCNT and fSCNT blastocysts, respectively. We obtained GEPs of 15 reprogramming-related genes in single blastocysts using multiplex PCR and found a broad range of variations in their GEPs. Weighted root-mean-square deviation (wRMSD) analysis, which calculates the deviation of SCNT blastocysts' GEPs from IVF blastocysts' mean GEP, found a significant difference between IVF and fSCNT and between cSCNT and fSCNT blastocysts (p < 0.001) but not between IVF and cSCNT. Since the fibroblasts' GEP was more distant from the IVF blastocysts' than the cumulus cells', it might partly explain the less similarity of fSCNT blastocysts' GEPs to the IVF's mean GEP. Our wRMSD method succeeds in expressing in figures how different two comparable embryo groups of different derivations are in GEP, which would be useful to select a better embryo derivation protocol among the candidates prior to field applications.
Keywords: Embryo; Multiplex PCR; Reprogramming; wRMSD.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Transcriptomic Features of Bovine Blastocysts Derived by Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer.G3 (Bethesda). 2015 Sep 3;5(12):2527-38. doi: 10.1534/g3.115.020016. G3 (Bethesda). 2015. PMID: 26342001 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of difference in gene expression profile between embryos of different derivations.Cell Reprogram. 2015 Feb;17(1):49-58. doi: 10.1089/cell.2014.0057. Epub 2014 Dec 30. Cell Reprogram. 2015. PMID: 25549061 Free PMC article.
-
Different preferences of IVF and SCNT bovine embryos for culture media.Zygote. 2014 Feb;22(1):1-9. doi: 10.1017/S0967199412000184. Epub 2012 Jul 11. Zygote. 2014. PMID: 22784408
-
Cloned human embryonic stem cells for tissue repair and transplantation.Stem Cell Rev. 2005;1(2):99-109. doi: 10.1385/SCR:1:2:099. Stem Cell Rev. 2005. PMID: 17142844 Review.
-
Determinant molecular markers for peri-gastrulating bovine embryo development.Reprod Fertil Dev. 2016;28(1-2):51-65. doi: 10.1071/RD15355. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2016. PMID: 27062874 Review.
Cited by
-
Age-associated bimodal transcriptional drift reduces intergenic disparities in transcription.Aging (Albany NY). 2018 Apr 27;10(4):789-807. doi: 10.18632/aging.101428. Aging (Albany NY). 2018. PMID: 29706608 Free PMC article.
-
The HIST1 Locus Escapes Reprogramming in Cloned Bovine Embryos.G3 (Bethesda). 2016 May 3;6(5):1365-71. doi: 10.1534/g3.115.026666. G3 (Bethesda). 2016. PMID: 26976441 Free PMC article.
-
Characterization of X-Chromosome Gene Expression in Bovine Blastocysts Derived by In vitro Fertilization and Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer.Front Genet. 2017 Apr 10;8:42. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2017.00042. eCollection 2017. Front Genet. 2017. PMID: 28443134 Free PMC article.
-
Determination of Oocyte-Manipulation, Zygote-Manipulation, and Genome-Reprogramming Effects on the Transcriptomes of Bovine Blastocysts.Front Genet. 2018 Apr 24;9:143. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00143. eCollection 2018. Front Genet. 2018. PMID: 29740477 Free PMC article.
-
Transcriptomic Features of Bovine Blastocysts Derived by Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer.G3 (Bethesda). 2015 Sep 3;5(12):2527-38. doi: 10.1534/g3.115.020016. G3 (Bethesda). 2015. PMID: 26342001 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources