Characteristics of Detected and Missed Prostate Cancer Foci on 3-T Multiparametric MRI Using an Endorectal Coil Correlated With Whole-Mount Thin-Section Histopathology
- PMID: 26102423
- PMCID: PMC4898906
- DOI: 10.2214/AJR.14.13285
Characteristics of Detected and Missed Prostate Cancer Foci on 3-T Multiparametric MRI Using an Endorectal Coil Correlated With Whole-Mount Thin-Section Histopathology
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the characteristics of prostate cancer foci missed on 3-T multiparametric MRI performed with an endorectal coil.
Materials and methods: The MRI examinations of 122 patients who underwent 3-T multiparametric MRI of the prostate with an endorectal coil were compared with whole-mount histopathology obtained after radical prostatectomy. The mean age of the patients was 60.6 years (SD, 7.6 years), and the mean prostate-specific antigen value was 7.2 ng/mL (SD, 5.9 ng/mL). The clinical, multiparametric MRI (i.e., T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging), and histopathologic features were obtained. After an independent review, two blinded genitourinary radiologists matched each case with a genitourinary pathologist. A structured reporting system was used to classify the multiparametric MRI features of each MRI-detected lesion. A chi-square analysis was performed for categoric variables, and the t test was performed for continuous variables.
Results: On whole-mount histopathology, 285 prostate cancer foci were detected in 122 patients. Of the 285 cancer foci detected at histopathology, 153 (53.3%) were missed on MRI and 132 (46.7%) were detected on MRI. Of the missed lesions, 75.2% were low-grade prostate cancer. Multiparametric MRI had a significantly higher sensitivity for prostate cancer foci 1 cm or larger than for subcentimeter foci (81.1% vs 18.9%, respectively; p < 0.001), for lesions with a Gleason score of 7 or greater than for lesions with a Gleason score of 6 (72.7% vs 27.3%; p < 0.01), and for index lesions than for satellite lesions (80.3% vs 20.8%; p < 0.01). The 3-T multiparametric MRI examinations showed a higher detection rate for lesions in the midgland or base of the gland compared with lesions in the apex (52.3% vs 22.0%, respectively; p < 0.01).
Conclusion: Compared with the prostate cancer lesions that were detected on multiparametric MRI, the prostate cancer lesions that were missed were significantly smaller, were more likely to be low-grade lesions (i.e., Gleason score of 6), were more commonly satellite lesions, and were more likely to be located in the prostatic apex.
Keywords: multiparametric prostate MRI; prostate cancer.
Figures





Similar articles
-
MRI of the Prostate With and Without Endorectal Coil at 3 T: Correlation With Whole-Mount Histopathologic Gleason Score.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Jul;215(1):133-141. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.22094. Epub 2020 Mar 11. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020. PMID: 32160050
-
Three Tesla Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Comparison of Performance with and without Endorectal Coil for Prostate Cancer Detection, PI-RADS™ version 2 Category and Staging with Whole Mount Histopathology Correlation.J Urol. 2019 Mar;201(3):496-502. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.09.054. J Urol. 2019. PMID: 30273608
-
Multifocality and prostate cancer detection by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with whole-mount histopathology.Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):569-76. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.079. Epub 2014 Sep 23. Eur Urol. 2015. PMID: 25257029
-
The cribriform morphology impairs Gleason 7 prostate cancer lesion detection on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.Prostate. 2023 Mar;83(4):331-339. doi: 10.1002/pros.24465. Epub 2022 Dec 7. Prostate. 2023. PMID: 36477738 Review.
-
Added Clinical Value of Whole-mount Histopathology of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: A Collaborative Review.Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Aug;4(4):558-569. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.08.003. Epub 2020 Aug 31. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021. PMID: 32883645 Review.
Cited by
-
Variability in accuracy of prostate cancer segmentation among radiologists, urologists, and scientists.Cancer Med. 2020 Oct;9(19):7172-7182. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3386. Epub 2020 Aug 18. Cancer Med. 2020. PMID: 32810385 Free PMC article.
-
Detectability of prostate cancer in different parts of the gland with 3-Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with whole-mount histopathology.Int J Clin Oncol. 2020 Apr;25(4):732-740. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01587-8. Epub 2019 Dec 2. Int J Clin Oncol. 2020. PMID: 31792635
-
The role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance-guided biopsy in active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: A systematic review.Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Jul 17;57:171-178. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.07.015. eCollection 2020 Sep. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020. PMID: 32774849 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The use of prostate MR for targeting prostate biopsies.BJR Open. 2019 Jun 19;1(1):20180044. doi: 10.1259/bjro.20180044. eCollection 2019. BJR Open. 2019. PMID: 33178929 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Relationship of prostate cancer topography and tumour conspicuity on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 5;12(1):e050376. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050376. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 34987040 Free PMC article.
References
-
- American Urological Association website. Taneja SS, Bjurlin M, Carter HB, et al. AUA/optimal techniques of prostate biopsy and specimen handling. [Accessed July 2, 2014]; www.auanet.org/common/pdf/education/clinical-guidance/Prostate-Biopsy-Wh.... Published 2013.
-
- Welch HG, Fisher ES, Gottlieb DJ, Barry MJ. Detection of prostate cancer via biopsy in the Medicare- SEER population during the PSA era. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:1395–1400. - PubMed
-
- Murphy G, Haider M, Ghai S, Sreeharsha B. The expanding role of MRI in prostate cancer. AJR. 2013;201:1229–1238. - PubMed
-
- Boonsirikamchai P, Choi S, Frank SJ, et al. MR imaging of prostate cancer in radiation oncology: what radiologists need to know. RadioGraphics. 2013;33:741–761. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous