Cost-Effectiveness of Collaborative Care for Depression in HIV Clinics
- PMID: 26102447
- PMCID: PMC4626259
- DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000732
Cost-Effectiveness of Collaborative Care for Depression in HIV Clinics
Abstract
Objective: To examine the cost-effectiveness of the HIV Translating Initiatives for Depression Into Effective Solutions (HITIDES) intervention.
Design: Randomized controlled effectiveness and implementation trial comparing depression collaborative care with enhanced usual care.
Setting: Three Veterans Health Administration HIV clinics in the Southern United States.
Subjects: Two hundred forty-nine HIV-infected patients completed the baseline interview; 123 were randomized to the intervention and 126 to usual care.
Intervention: HITIDES consisted of an offsite HIV depression care team that delivered up to 12 months of collaborative care. The intervention used a stepped-care model for depression treatment, and specific recommendations were based on the Texas Medication Algorithm Project and the VA/Department of Defense Depression Treatment Guidelines.
Main outcome measures: Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated using the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey, the Quality of Well Being Scale, and by converting depression-free days to QALYs. The base case analysis used outpatient, pharmacy, patient, and intervention costs. Cost-effectiveness was calculated using incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and net health benefit. ICER distributions were generated using nonparametric bootstrap with replacement sampling.
Results: The HITIDES intervention was more effective and cost saving compared with usual care in 78% of bootstrapped samples. The intervention net health benefit was positive and therefore deemed cost-effective using an ICER threshold of $50,000/QALY.
Conclusions: In HIV clinic settings, this intervention was more effective and cost saving compared with usual care. Implementation of offsite depression collaborative care programs in specialty care settings may be a strategy that not only improves outcomes for patients but also maximizes the efficient use of limited health care resources.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of a rural telemedicine collaborative care intervention for depression.Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010 Aug;67(8):812-21. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.82. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010. PMID: 20679589 Clinical Trial.
-
Development and implementation of collaborative care for depression in HIV clinics.AIDS Care. 2011 Dec;23(12):1626-36. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2011.579943. Epub 2011 Jun 30. AIDS Care. 2011. PMID: 21714689 Clinical Trial.
-
Cost-effectiveness of on-site versus off-site collaborative care for depression in rural FQHCs.Psychiatr Serv. 2015 May 1;66(5):491-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400186. Epub 2015 Feb 17. Psychiatr Serv. 2015. PMID: 25686811 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Behavioural modification interventions for medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2020 Sep;24(46):1-490. doi: 10.3310/hta24460. Health Technol Assess. 2020. PMID: 32975190 Free PMC article.
-
Multi-gene Pharmacogenomic Testing That Includes Decision-Support Tools to Guide Medication Selection for Major Depression: A Health Technology Assessment.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2021 Aug 12;21(13):1-214. eCollection 2021. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2021. PMID: 34484487 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Economic evaluation of remote patient monitoring and organizational analysis according to patient involvement: a scoping review.Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 Sep 26;39(1):e59. doi: 10.1017/S0266462323002581. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023. PMID: 37750813 Free PMC article.
-
Pharmacy-based management for depression in adults.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 23;12(12):CD013299. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013299.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31868236 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness of guideline-based stepped and collaborative care versus treatment as usual for patients with depression - a cluster-randomized trial.BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Aug 28;20(1):427. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02829-0. BMC Psychiatry. 2020. PMID: 32859177 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The collaborative care model for HIV and depression: Patient perspectives and experiences from a safety-net clinic in the United States.SAGE Open Med. 2019 Apr 2;7:2050312119842249. doi: 10.1177/2050312119842249. eCollection 2019. SAGE Open Med. 2019. PMID: 31044076 Free PMC article.
-
The Cost Effectiveness of Mental Health Treatment in the Lifetime of Older Adults with HIV in New York City: A Markov Approach.Pharmacoecon Open. 2021 Jun;5(2):221-236. doi: 10.1007/s41669-020-00238-3. Epub 2020 Nov 9. Pharmacoecon Open. 2021. PMID: 33165825 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Robinson WD, Geske JA, Prest LA, Barnacle R. Depression treatment in primary care. The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice. 2005;18:79–86. - PubMed
-
- Katon W, Von Korff M, Lin E, Simon G, Walker E, Unutzer J, et al. Stepped collaborative care for primary care patients with persistent symptoms of depression: a randomized trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56:1109–1115. - PubMed
-
- Katon W, Robinson P, Von Korff M, Lin E, Bush T, Ludman E, et al. A multifaceted intervention to improve treatment of depression in primary care. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1996;53:924–932. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical