Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 May 8;16(3):4959.
doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i3.4959.

Potential of 3D printing technologies for fabrication of electron bolus and proton compensators

Affiliations

Potential of 3D printing technologies for fabrication of electron bolus and proton compensators

Wei Zou et al. J Appl Clin Med Phys. .

Abstract

In electron and proton radiotherapy, applications of patient-specific electron bolus or proton compensators during radiation treatments are often necessary to accommodate patient body surface irregularities, tissue inhomogeneity, and variations in PTV depths to achieve desired dose distributions. Emerging 3D printing technologies provide alternative fabrication methods for these bolus and compensators. This study investigated the potential of utilizing 3D printing technologies for the fabrication of the electron bolus and proton compensators. Two printing technologies, fused deposition modeling (FDM) and selective laser sintering (SLS), and two printing materials, PLA and polyamide, were investigated. Samples were printed and characterized with CT scan and under electron and proton beams. In addition, a software package was developed to convert electron bolus and proton compensator designs to printable Standard Tessellation Language file format. A phantom scalp electron bolus was printed with FDM technology with PLA material. The HU of the printed electron bolus was 106.5 ± 15.2. A prostate patient proton compensator was printed with SLS technology and polyamide material with -70.1 ± 8.1 HU. The profiles of the electron bolus and proton compensator were compared with the original designs. The average over all the CT slices of the largest Euclidean distance between the design and the fabricated bolus on each CT slice was found to be 0.84 ± 0.45 mm and for the compensator to be 0.40 ± 0.42 mm. It is recommended that the properties of specific 3D printed objects are understood before being applied to radiotherapy treatments.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Characterization setup for 3D printed cubes under (a) electron beam with a field projection of 10×10cm cone at 100 cm SSD, and (b) proton monoenergetic pencil beam.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of the film measurements with the TPS dose calculations for the PLA cube irradiated with 300 MU 12 MeV electron beam. The horizontal planar dose distribution at 3 cm depth underneath the cube (a) on the film and (b) TPS calculation. The vertical dose distribution beyond 3 cm depth under the cube (c) on a film and (d) from TPS calculation. The black line in (c) and (d) marks the 5 cm depth. The color bar shows dose in cGy.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Proton depth0dose curves under monoenergetic pencil beam with and without the 3D printed cubes intercepting the beam. Sample A was the 4 cm polyamide cube, B was the 3 cm PLA cube. Solid lines correspond to measured depth‐dose curves and dashed lines correspond to Monte Carlo‐simulated curves.
Figure 4
Figure 4
3D rendering of (a) electron bolus and (b) proton compensator from the model STL files. The printed (c) electron bolus (d) proton compensator.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Example of a CT slice of the 3D‐printed (a) electron bolus, (b) proton compensator; and the scanned profiles of (c) electron bolus and (d) proton compensator in comparison with the design.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kudchadker RJ, Antolak JA, Morrison MH, Wong PF, Hogstrom KR. Utilization of custom electron bolus in head and neck radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2003;4(4):321–33. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zeidan OA, Chauhan BD, Estabrook WW, Willoughby TR, Manon RR, Meeks SL. Image‐guided bolus electron conformal therapy – a case study. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2010;12(1):68–75. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Low DA, Starkschall G, Sherman NE, Bujnowski SW, Ewton JR, Hogstrom KR. Computer‐aided design and fabrication of an electron bolus for treatment of the paraspinal muscles. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;33(5):1127–38. - PubMed
    1. Perkins GH, McNeese MD, Antolak JA, Buchholz TA, Strom EA, Hogstrom KR. A custom three‐dimensional electron bolus technique for optimization of postmastectomy irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;51(4):1142–51. - PubMed
    1. Kim MM, Kudchadker RJ, Kanke JE, Zhang S, Perkins GH. Bolus electron conformal therapy for the treatment of recurrent inflammatory breast cancer: a case report. Med Dosim. 2012;37(2):208–13. - PubMed

Publication types