Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 May 8;16(3):5232.
doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i3.5232.

A special report of current state of the medical physicist workforce - results of the 2012 ASTRO Comprehensive Workforce Study

Erli Chen  1 , Anna Arnone, Jussi K Sillanpaa, Yan Yu, Michael D Mills
Affiliations
Review

A special report of current state of the medical physicist workforce - results of the 2012 ASTRO Comprehensive Workforce Study

Erli Chen et al. J Appl Clin Med Phys. .

Abstract

The medical physics profession is undergoing significant changes. Starting in 2014, candidates registering for certification exams by the American Board of Radiology must have completed a CAMPEP-accredited residency. This requirement, along with tightened state regulations, uncertainty in future reimbursement, and a stronger emphasis on board certification, have raised questions concerning the state of the medical physics workforce and its ability to adapt to changing requirements. In 2012, ASTRO conducted a workforce study of the comprehensive field of radiation oncology. This article reviews the findings of the medical physics section of the study, including age and gender distribution, educational background, workload, and primary work setting. We also report on job satisfaction, the perceived supply and demand of medical physicists, and the medical physicists' main concerns pertaining to patient safety and quality assurance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Perception of current supply vs. demand.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Who is responsible for error follow‐up.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Mariotto AB, Yabroff KR, Shao Y, Shao Y. Feuer EJ. Brown ML. Projections of the cost of cancer care in the United States: 2010–2020. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103(2):117–28. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mills MD, Thornewill J, Esterhay RJ. Future trends in the supply and demand for radiation oncology physicists. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2010;11(2):3005. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vichare A, Washington R, Patton C, et al. An assessment of the current U.S. radiation oncology workforce: methodology and global results of the American Society for Radiation Oncology 2012 Workforce Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;87(5):1129–34. - PubMed
    1. Qualtrics [online survey software]. Salt Lake City, UT: Qualtrics, LLC.
    1. IBM . IBM SPSS Statistics, version 20. Armonk, NY: International Business Machines Corp.

LinkOut - more resources