Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Jun 23;17(6):e148.
doi: 10.2196/jmir.4255.

Patient Portals and Patient Engagement: A State of the Science Review

Affiliations
Review

Patient Portals and Patient Engagement: A State of the Science Review

Taya Irizarry et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Patient portals (ie, electronic personal health records tethered to institutional electronic health records) are recognized as a promising mechanism to support greater patient engagement, yet questions remain about how health care leaders, policy makers, and designers can encourage adoption of patient portals and what factors might contribute to sustained utilization.

Objective: The purposes of this state of the science review are to (1) present the definition, background, and how current literature addresses the encouragement and support of patient engagement through the patient portal, and (2) provide a summary of future directions for patient portal research and development to meaningfully impact patient engagement.

Methods: We reviewed literature from 2006 through 2014 in PubMed, Ovid Medline, and PsycInfo using the search terms "patient portal" OR "personal health record" OR "electronic personal health record". Final inclusion criterion dictated that studies report on the patient experience and/or ways that patients may be supported to make competent health care decisions and act on those decisions using patient portal functionality.

Results: We found 120 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Based on the research questions, explicit and implicit aims of the studies, and related measures addressed, the studies were grouped into five major topics (patient adoption, provider endorsement, health literacy, usability, and utility). We discuss the findings and conclusions of studies that address the five topical areas.

Conclusions: Current research has demonstrated that patients' interest and ability to use patient portals is strongly influenced by personal factors such age, ethnicity, education level, health literacy, health status, and role as a caregiver. Health care delivery factors, mainly provider endorsement and patient portal usability also contribute to patient's ability to engage through and with the patient portal. Future directions of research should focus on identifying specific populations and contextual considerations that would benefit most from a greater degree of patient engagement through a patient portal. Ultimately, adoption by patients and endorsement by providers will come when existing patient portal features align with patients' and providers' information needs and functionality.

Keywords: electronic personal health record; meaningful use; patient engagement; patient portal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Literature review flow chart.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rockville MD, Maurer M, Dardess P, Carman KL, Frazier K, Smeeding L. Guide to Patient and Family Engagement: Environmental Scan Report. 2012. [2015-01-17]. http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/final-reports/ptfamilyscan/ptfamil... .
    1. Kupchunas William R. Personal health record: new opportunity for patient education. Orthop Nurs. 2007;26(3):185–91; quiz 192. doi: 10.1097/01.NOR.0000276971.86937.c4.00006416-200705000-00011 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Halamka John D, Mandl Kenneth D, Tang Paul C. Early experiences with personal health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15(1):1–7. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2562. http://jamia.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=17947615 M2562 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mandl Kenneth D, Simons William W, Crawford William C R, Abbett Jonathan M. Indivo: a personally controlled health record for health information exchange and communication. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2007;7:25. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-7-25. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/7/25 1472-6947-7-25 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weitzman Elissa R, Kaci Liljana, Mandl Kenneth D. Acceptability of a personally controlled health record in a community-based setting: implications for policy and design. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(2):e14. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1187. http://www.jmir.org/2009/2/e14/ v11i2e14 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types