Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jun 24:15:244.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0879-z.

High performing hospitals: a qualitative systematic review of associated factors and practical strategies for improvement

Natalie Taylor  1 , Robyn Clay-Williams  2 , Emily Hogden  3 , Jeffrey Braithwaite  4 , Oliver Groene  5
Affiliations

High performing hospitals: a qualitative systematic review of associated factors and practical strategies for improvement

Natalie Taylor et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: High performing hospitals attain excellence across multiple measures of performance and multiple departments. Studying high performing hospitals can be valuable if factors associated with high performance can be identified and applied. Factors leading to high performance are complex and an exclusive quantitative approach may fail to identify richly descriptive or relevant contextual factors. The objective of this study was to undertake a systematic review of qualitative literature to identify methods used to identify high performing hospitals, the factors associated with high performers, and practical strategies for improvement.

Methods: Methods used to collect and summarise the evidence contributing to this review followed the 'enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research' protocol. Peer reviewed studies were identified through Medline, Embase and Cinahl (Jan 2000-Feb 2014) using specified key words, subject terms, and medical subject headings. Eligible studies required the use of a quantitative method to identify high performing hospitals, and qualitative methods or tools to identify factors associated with high performing hospitals or hospital departments. Title, abstract, and full text screening was undertaken by four reviewers, and inter-rater reliability statistics were calculated for each review phase. Risk of bias was assessed. Following data extraction, thematic syntheses identified contextual factors important for explaining success. Practical strategies for achieving high performance were then mapped against the identified themes.

Results: A total of 19 studies from a possible 11,428 were included in the review. A range of process, output, outcome and other indicators were used to identify high performing hospitals. Seven themes representing factors associated with high performance (and 25 sub-themes) emerged from the thematic syntheses: positive organisational culture, senior management support, effective performance monitoring, building and maintaining a proficient workforce, effective leaders across the organisation, expertise-driven practice, and interdisciplinary teamwork. Fifty six practical strategies for achieving high performance were catalogued.

Conclusions: This review provides insights into methods used to identify high performing hospitals, and yields ideas about the factors important for success. It highlights the need to advance approaches for understanding what constitutes high performance and how to harness factors associated with high performance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Search and review strategy (PRISMA flow diagram)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Rich picture of high performing hospitals
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Groene O, Skau JK, Frolich A. An international review of projects on hospital performance assessment. International J Qual Health Care. 2008;20(3):162–71. - PubMed
    1. Aghaei Hashjin A, Kringos DS, Manoochehri J, Aryankhesal A, Klazinga N. Development and impact of the Iranian hospital performance measurement program. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):448. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Braithwaite J, Matsuyama Y, Mannion R, Johnson J, editors. Healthcare reform, quality and safety: perspectives, participants, partnerships and prospects in 30 countries. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate; 2015. - PubMed
    1. McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, Keesey J, Hicks J, DeCristofaro A, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(26):2635–45. - PubMed
    1. Runciman WB, Hunt TD, Hannaford NA, Hibbert PD, Westbrook JI, Coiera EW, et al. CareTrack: assessing the appropriateness of health care delivery in Australia. Med J Aust. 2012;197(2):100–5. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms