Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Nov;22(21):16881-8.
doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-4872-1. Epub 2015 Jun 25.

Removal, redistribution, and potential risks of soil Cd, Pb, and Zn after washing with various extractants

Affiliations

Removal, redistribution, and potential risks of soil Cd, Pb, and Zn after washing with various extractants

Chunle Chen et al. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015 Nov.

Abstract

The effectiveness of four different washing extractants--HCl, FeCl3, citric acid, and EDTA--in removing Cd, Pb, and Zn from polluted soil was studied. The removal of these metals, their redistribution between fractions, and the potential risks posed by them, in soils washed with the tested extractants, were examined. Although all the rounds of washing removed Cd, Pb, and Zn from soil, the first round removed more metals than subsequent rounds. Each of the four extractants had different effects on the removal of the metals. At the end of the first round of washing, HCl, EDTA, and FeCl3 were the most effective in removing Zn, Pb, and Cd, respectively. Both the single round and five successive rounds of washing with various extractants resulted in significant increases in Pb in the exchangeable/acid extractable fraction. Washing with HCl, EDTA, and FeCl3 significantly reduced potential risks (calculated as the Potential Risk Index, PRI) posed by Cd in washed soil. The first round of washing, using all extractants, increased the risks posed by Pb and Zn. However, five successive rounds of washing with FeCl3 and EDTA reduced the risk posed by Pb, and washing with citric acid and FeCl3 increased the risks posed by Zn. EDTA and HCl were better for reducing Zn risks, and successive washing with EDTA and FeCl3 were more effective in reducing Pb risks than the other extractants. Finally, five successive rounds of washing, with all the extractants, effectively reduced the potential risks posed by Cd. Among the four reagents, EDTA was advised to be the alternative of the washing reagent by significantly reducing the PRI values of Cd, Pb, and Zn.

Keywords: Bioavailability; Feasibility; Heavy metals; Remediation; Soil pollution.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Environ Technol. 2014 May-Jun;35(9-12):1389-400 - PubMed
    1. Chemosphere. 2006 Jun;63(10):1736-43 - PubMed
    1. J Hazard Mater. 2010 Jan 15;173(1-3):369-76 - PubMed
    1. Environ Pollut. 2007 Jun;147(3):729-36 - PubMed
    1. Environ Pollut. 2006 Nov;144(1):2-10 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources