A comparative study between the efficacy of oral cimetidine and low-dose systemic meglumine antimoniate (MA) with a standard dose of systemic MA in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis
- PMID: 26108265
- DOI: 10.1111/ijd.12709
A comparative study between the efficacy of oral cimetidine and low-dose systemic meglumine antimoniate (MA) with a standard dose of systemic MA in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis
Abstract
Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a major world health problem, which is increasing in incidence. Pentavalent antimonials have been considered as standard treatment for leishmaniasis. Many studies are performed to find an effective and safe treatment for patients with CL. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of oral cimetidine and low-dose systemic meglumine antimoniate (MA) with standard dose of systemic MA in the treatment of CL. This study was, to our knowledge, the first to show the effect of combination therapy oral cimetidine and MA in the treatment of CL all over the world. In this randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial, 120 patients with suspected CL were referred to the Aleppo University Hospital Clinic; 90 of these patients with the clinical and parasitological diagnosis of CL were recruited and were randomly divided into three treatment groups of 30 subjects each. Group A was treated with MA 60 mg/kg/d IM and oral placebo. Groups B and C received MA 30 mg/kg/d IM and oral cimetidine 1200 mg/d, MA 30 mg/kg/d IM and oral placebo, respectively. The duration of treatment was three weeks for all groups. The effectiveness of the treatment was classified in three levels as complete response, partial response, and no response. Data were analyzed by SPSS 19 using KI square, Mann-Whitney, Kaplan-Mayer, and ANOVA tests. At the end of the study (12 weeks), the rate of complete response was 91.11% in the first group, and 84.66% and 78.33% in groups B and C, respectively (P < 0.05). The highest response rate was for the group treated with a standard dose of systemic MA and placebo. Our results showed that although oral cimetidine and low-dose systemic MA had less efficacy in comparison to a standard dose of systemic MA in the treatment of CL, it still can be considered as a replacement therapy in high-risk patients (such as patients with heart, kidney, and/or liver disease) under close supervision of physicians.
© 2015 The International Society of Dermatology.
Similar articles
-
A comparative study between the efficacy of systemic meglumine antimoniate therapy with standard or low dose plus oral omeprazole in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis.J Vector Borne Dis. 2008 Dec;45(4):287-91. J Vector Borne Dis. 2008. PMID: 19248655 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative study of the efficacy of oral ketoconazole with intra-lesional meglumine antimoniate (Glucantime) for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis.J Dermatolog Treat. 2001 Sep;12(3):159-62. doi: 10.1080/09546630152607899. J Dermatolog Treat. 2001. PMID: 12243707 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of the effectiveness of two topical paromomycin treatments versus meglumine antimoniate for New World cutaneous leishmaniasis.Acta Trop. 2004 Jul;91(2):153-60. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2004.03.009. Acta Trop. 2004. PMID: 15234664 Clinical Trial.
-
American tegumentary leishmaniasis in Brazil: a critical review of the current therapeutic approach with systemic meglumine antimoniate and short-term possibilities for an alternative treatment.Trop Med Int Health. 2019 Apr;24(4):380-391. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13210. Epub 2019 Feb 19. Trop Med Int Health. 2019. PMID: 30681239 Review.
-
Cutaneous leishmaniasis.Clin Exp Dermatol. 2000 Jul;25(5):363-70. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2230.2000.00664.x. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2000. PMID: 11012586 Review.
Cited by
-
Interventions for Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 17;11(11):CD005067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005067.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 01;12:CD005067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005067.pub5. PMID: 29149474 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Acid-Suppressive Therapy and Risk of Infections: Pros and Cons.Clin Drug Investig. 2017 Jul;37(7):587-624. doi: 10.1007/s40261-017-0519-y. Clin Drug Investig. 2017. PMID: 28361440 Review.
-
Cutaneous Leishmaniasis: A 2022 Updated Narrative Review into Diagnosis and Management Developments.Am J Clin Dermatol. 2022 Nov;23(6):823-840. doi: 10.1007/s40257-022-00726-8. Epub 2022 Sep 14. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2022. PMID: 36103050 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Interventions for Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 1;12(12):CD005067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005067.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 29192424 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources