Effectiveness, safety and costs of orphan drugs: an evidence-based review
- PMID: 26109112
- PMCID: PMC4480037
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007199
Effectiveness, safety and costs of orphan drugs: an evidence-based review
Erratum in
-
Correction.BMJ Open. 2015 Oct 26;5(10):e007199corr1. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007199corr1. BMJ Open. 2015. PMID: 26503381 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Introduction: Several orphan drugs have been approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) over the past two decades. However, the drugs are expensive, and in some instances, the evidence for effectiveness is not convincing at the time of regulatory approval. Our objective was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of orphan drugs that have been granted marketing licenses in Europe, determine the annual costs of each drug, compare the costs of branded orphan drugs against their generic equivalents, and explore any relationships between orphan drug disease prevalence and annual costs.
Methods: We searched the EMA database to identify orphan drugs granted marketing authorisation up to April 2014. Electronic searches were also conducted in PubMed, EMBASE and Google Scholar, to assess data on effectiveness, safety and annual costs. 2 reviewers independently evaluated the levels and quality of evidence, and extracted data.
Results: We identified 74 orphan drugs, with 54 (73%) demonstrating moderate quality of evidence. 85% showed significant clinical effects, but serious adverse events were reported in 86.5%. Their annual costs were between £726 and £378,000. There was a significant inverse relationship between disease prevalence and annual costs (p = 0.01); this was largely due to the influence of the ultra-orphan diseases. We could not determine whether the balance between effectiveness and safety influenced annual costs. For 10 drugs where generic alternatives were available, the branded drugs were 1.4 to 82,000 times more expensive.
Conclusions: The available evidence suggests that there is inconsistency in the quality of evidence of approved orphan drugs, and there is no clear mechanism for determining their prices. In some cases, far cheaper generic agents appear to be available. A more robust, transparent and standard mechanism for determining annual costs is imperative.
Keywords: GENERAL MEDICINE (see Internal Medicine); ORPHAN DRUGS; PRIMARY CARE.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Orphan drugs, orphan diseases. The first decade of orphan drug legislation in the EU.Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Apr;69(4):1009-24. doi: 10.1007/s00228-012-1423-2. Epub 2012 Oct 23. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013. PMID: 23090701
-
EU marketing authorization review of orphan and non-orphan drugs does not differ.Drug Discov Today. 2013 Oct;18(19-20):1001-6. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2013.06.012. Epub 2013 Jul 5. Drug Discov Today. 2013. PMID: 23835230 Review.
-
Estimating the budget impact of orphan medicines in Europe: 2010 - 2020.Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011 Sep 27;6:62. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-6-62. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011. PMID: 21951518 Free PMC article.
-
Marketing authorisation of orphan medicines in Europe from 2000 to 2013.Drug Discov Today. 2018 Feb;23(2):424-433. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2017.10.012. Epub 2017 Oct 23. Drug Discov Today. 2018. PMID: 29074441 Review.
-
Failures to further developing orphan medicinal products after designation granted in Europe: an analysis of marketing authorisation failures and abandoned drugs.BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 11;7(9):e017358. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017358. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 28893754 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Unraveling elements of value-based pricing from a pharmaceutical industry's perspective: a scoping review.Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jun 24;15:1298923. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1298923. eCollection 2024. Front Pharmacol. 2024. PMID: 38978982 Free PMC article.
-
Determinants of Orphan Drug Prices in Germany.Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Apr;38(4):397-411. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00872-8. Pharmacoeconomics. 2020. PMID: 31903523
-
Recommendations from the European Working Group for Value Assessment and Funding Processes in Rare Diseases (ORPH-VAL).Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017 Mar 10;12(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s13023-017-0601-9. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017. PMID: 28283046 Free PMC article.
-
Factors Contributing to the Efficacy-Effectiveness Gap in the Case of Orphan Drugs for Metabolic Diseases.Drugs. 2017 Sep;77(13):1461-1472. doi: 10.1007/s40265-017-0788-z. Drugs. 2017. PMID: 28752290 Free PMC article.
-
Characteristics of clinical trials in rare vs. common diseases: A register-based Latvian study.PLoS One. 2018 Apr 3;13(4):e0194494. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194494. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29614103 Free PMC article.
References
-
- European Medicines Agency (EMA). Orphan drugs and rare diseases at a glance. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Other/2010/01/WC500...
-
- National Institute for Clinical Excellence. NICE citizens council report ultra orphan drugs. London: NICE, 2004. http://www.nice.org.uk/proxy/?sourceUrl=http://www.nice.org.uk/niceMedia... (accessed 7 May 2015). - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous