Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Jun 24;5(6):e007199.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007199.

Effectiveness, safety and costs of orphan drugs: an evidence-based review

Affiliations
Review

Effectiveness, safety and costs of orphan drugs: an evidence-based review

Igho J Onakpoya et al. BMJ Open. .

Erratum in

  • Correction.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] BMJ Open. 2015 Oct 26;5(10):e007199corr1. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007199corr1. BMJ Open. 2015. PMID: 26503381 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Introduction: Several orphan drugs have been approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) over the past two decades. However, the drugs are expensive, and in some instances, the evidence for effectiveness is not convincing at the time of regulatory approval. Our objective was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of orphan drugs that have been granted marketing licenses in Europe, determine the annual costs of each drug, compare the costs of branded orphan drugs against their generic equivalents, and explore any relationships between orphan drug disease prevalence and annual costs.

Methods: We searched the EMA database to identify orphan drugs granted marketing authorisation up to April 2014. Electronic searches were also conducted in PubMed, EMBASE and Google Scholar, to assess data on effectiveness, safety and annual costs. 2 reviewers independently evaluated the levels and quality of evidence, and extracted data.

Results: We identified 74 orphan drugs, with 54 (73%) demonstrating moderate quality of evidence. 85% showed significant clinical effects, but serious adverse events were reported in 86.5%. Their annual costs were between £726 and £378,000. There was a significant inverse relationship between disease prevalence and annual costs (p = 0.01); this was largely due to the influence of the ultra-orphan diseases. We could not determine whether the balance between effectiveness and safety influenced annual costs. For 10 drugs where generic alternatives were available, the branded drugs were 1.4 to 82,000 times more expensive.

Conclusions: The available evidence suggests that there is inconsistency in the quality of evidence of approved orphan drugs, and there is no clear mechanism for determining their prices. In some cases, far cheaper generic agents appear to be available. A more robust, transparent and standard mechanism for determining annual costs is imperative.

Keywords: GENERAL MEDICINE (see Internal Medicine); ORPHAN DRUGS; PRIMARY CARE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart showing process for inclusion of European Medicines Agency (EMA)-approved orphan drugs.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pie charts showing the (A) levels and (B) quality of evidence of European Medicines Agency (EMA)-approved orphan drugs by proportion.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Scatter plot of orphan disease prevalence against annual cost.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Scatter plot of ultra-orphan disease prevalence against annual cost.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Price comparison of branded orphan drugs versus generic/unlicensed versions.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dear JW, Lilitkarntakul P, Webb DJ. Are rare diseases still orphans or happily adopted? The challenges of developing and using orphan medicinal products. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2006;623:264–71. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sharma A, Jacob A, Tandon M et al. . Orphan drug: development trends and strategies. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2010;2:290–9. 10.4103/0975-7406.72128 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. European Medicines Agency (EMA). Orphan drugs and rare diseases at a glance. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Other/2010/01/WC500...
    1. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. NICE citizens council report ultra orphan drugs. London: NICE, 2004. http://www.nice.org.uk/proxy/?sourceUrl=http://www.nice.org.uk/niceMedia... (accessed 7 May 2015). - PubMed
    1. Hughes DA, Tunnage B, Yeo ST. Drugs for exceptionally rare diseases: do they deserve special status for funding? QJM 2005;98:829–36. 10.1093/qjmed/hci128 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources