Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Nov;50(6):654-60.
doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agv067. Epub 2015 Jun 23.

Analysis of Price Changes in Washington Following the 2012 Liquor Privatization

William C Kerr  1 , Edwina Williams  2 , Thomas K Greenfield  2
Affiliations

Analysis of Price Changes in Washington Following the 2012 Liquor Privatization

William C Kerr et al. Alcohol Alcohol. 2015 Nov.

Abstract

Aims: In June, 2012 the state of Washington ended a wholesale and retail monopoly on liquor sales resulting in about five times as many stores selling liquor. Three-tier restrictions were also removed on liquor, while beer and wine availability did not increase. Substantial taxes at both the wholesale and retail levels were implemented and it was expected that prices would rise.

Methods: To evaluate price changes after privatization we developed an index of about 68 brands that were popular in Washington during early 2012. Data on final liquor prices (including all taxes) in Washington were obtained through store visits and on-line sources between November 2013 and March of 2014. Primary analyses were conducted on five or six brand indexes to allow the inclusion of most stores.

Results: Washington liquor prices rose by an average of 15.5% for the 750 ml size and by 4.7% for the 1.75 l size, while only small changes were seen in the bordering states of Oregon and Idaho. Prices were found to vary greatly by store type. Liquor Superstores had generally the lowest prices while drugstore, grocery and especially smaller Liquor Store prices were found to be substantially higher.

Conclusion: Our findings indicate that liquor prices in Washington increased substantially after privatization and as compared to price changes in bordering states, with a much larger increase seen for the 750 ml size and with wide variation across store types. However, persistent drinkers looking for low prices will be able to find them in certain stores.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Locations of Washington liquor retail licenses and total population by county. Bold borders indicate counties where store visits occurred.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ally AK, Meng Y, Chakraborty R, et al. (2014) Alcohol tax pass-through across the product and price range: do retailers treat cheap alcohol differently? Addiction 109:1994–2002. - PubMed
    1. Campbell CA, Hahn RA, Elder R, et al. (2009) The effectiveness of limiting alcohol outlet density as a means of reducing excessive alcohol consumption and alcohol-related harms. Am J Prev Med 37:556–69. - PubMed
    1. Cook PJ. (2007) Paying the Tab: The Costs and Benefits of Alcohol Control. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    1. Cull I. (2014) Washingtonians flock to Idaho for cheaper alcohol. Spokane, WA: KXLY4; Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6VOG0gdTX (6 January 2015, date last accessed).
    1. ESRI. (2011) ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute.

Publication types