Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Sep-Oct;7(5):317-34.
doi: 10.1002/wsbm.1308. Epub 2015 Jun 24.

Metabolic network modeling of microbial communities

Affiliations
Review

Metabolic network modeling of microbial communities

Matthew B Biggs et al. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med. 2015 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Genome-scale metabolic network reconstructions and constraint-based analyses are powerful methods that have the potential to make functional predictions about microbial communities. Genome-scale metabolic networks are used to characterize the metabolic functions of microbial communities via several techniques including species compartmentalization, separating species-level and community-level objectives, dynamic analysis, the 'enzyme-soup' approach, multiscale modeling, and others. There are many challenges in the field, including a need for tools that accurately assign high-level omics signals to individual community members, the need for improved automated network reconstruction methods, and novel algorithms for integrating omics data and engineering communities. As technologies and modeling frameworks improve, we expect that there will be corresponding advances in the fields of ecology, health science, and microbial community engineering.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. There are many aspects of life in a microbial community that would be useful to capture using mathematical models
Techniques utilizing constraint-based metabolic models (sometimes in conjunction with other modeling approaches) are capable of capturing all of these scenarios.
Figure 2
Figure 2. A simple workflow for genome-scale metabolic network reconstruction and accompanying constraint-based analysis
The process begins with an annotated genome. The metabolic network is derived from this genome annotation by searching databases for homologous proteins with known enzymatic activity. The corresponding metabolic reactions are collected into a draft network reconstruction. This simple procedure can be augmented through gap filling, and often manual curation. A metabolic objective is defined, which for microbes is often assumed to be a biomass equation (i.e. it is assumed that cells are configured to grow as fast as possible). Exchange reactions are defined to allow metabolites to enter and leave the network. All reactions are compiled into a stoichiometric (S) matrix. FBA is a common analytical approach that searches for a flux distribution through the network that optimizes the metabolic objective subject to steady-state constraints and flux bounds.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Community modeling frameworks that feature GENREs
The compartmentalization approach unites all species-level GENREs into a unified stoichiometric matrix with a shared compartment. The objective function is generally assumed to be a linear combination of the individual biomass functions from each species. The community objectives approach (OptCom) is an extension of the simple compartmentalization approach that utilizes a nested, bi-level optimization framework. The bi-level optimization approach enables the representation of more classes of interactions between species, but comes at the cost of increased computational complexity. Dynamic analysis simulates changes in metabolites and biomass over time, which requires constraints on uptake reaction kinetics. “Enzyme soup” FBA ignores species boundaries and assumes that all reactions can interact in a community-level meta-GENRE. Other methods include: graph-based methods, which can be used to quantify general characteristics of an interaction between species, such as the level expected competition or cooperation; network expansion, which has been used to identify potential emergent biosynthetic capacity between species by comparing species-specific “reachable” metabolites to the result of pooling reactions from both species; comparative analyses, which are used to assess the differences in gene essentiality, biosynthetic capacity and resource utilization between species.

References

    1. Rousk J, Bengtson P. Microbial regulation of global biogeochemical cycles. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2014;5(March):305–7. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00103. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chaparro JM, Sheflin AM, Manter DK, Vivanco JM. Manipulating the soil microbiome to increase soil health and plant fertility. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 2012;48:489–99. doi: 10.1007/s00374-012-0691-4. - DOI
    1. Kinross JM, Darzi AW, Nicholson JK. Gut microbiome-host interactions in health and disease. Genome medicine. 2011;3:14. doi: 10.1186/gm228. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smid EJ, Erkus O, Spus M, Wolkers-Rooijackers JC, Alexeeva S, Kleerebezem M. Functional implications of the microbial community structure of undefined mesophilic starter cultures. Microbial Cell Factories. BioMed Central Ltd. 2014;13(Suppl 1):S2. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-13-S1-S2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van Der Heijden MGa, Bardgett RD, Van Straalen NM. The unseen majority: Soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecology Letters. 2008;11:296–310. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01139.x. - DOI - PubMed

Further Reading/Resources

    1. Röling WFM, Ferrer M, Golyshin PN. Systems approaches to microbial communities and their functioning. Current opinion in biotechnology. Elsevier Ltd. 2010;21(4):532–8. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2010.06.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Klitgord N, Segrè D. Ecosystems biology of microbial metabolism. Current opinion in biotechnology. 2011;22(4):541–6. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2011.04.018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Karlsson FH, Nookaew I, Petranovic D, Nielsen J. Prospects for systems biology and modeling of the gut microbiome. Trends in biotechnology. Elsevier Ltd. 2011;29(6):251–8. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2011.01.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Borenstein E. Computational systems biology and in silico modeling of the human microbiome. Briefings in bioinformatics. 2012;13(6):769–80. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbs022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zengler K, Palsson BO. A road map for the development of community systems (CoSy) biology. Nature reviews Microbiology. Nature Publishing Group. 2012;10(5):366–72. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2763. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources