Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015;11(4):872-894.
doi: 10.1007/s11306-014-0746-7. Epub 2014 Nov 21.

Standardizing the experimental conditions for using urine in NMR-based metabolomic studies with a particular focus on diagnostic studies: a review

Affiliations
Review

Standardizing the experimental conditions for using urine in NMR-based metabolomic studies with a particular focus on diagnostic studies: a review

Abdul-Hamid Emwas et al. Metabolomics. 2015.

Abstract

The metabolic composition of human biofluids can provide important diagnostic and prognostic information. Among the biofluids most commonly analyzed in metabolomic studies, urine appears to be particularly useful. It is abundant, readily available, easily stored and can be collected by simple, noninvasive techniques. Moreover, given its chemical complexity, urine is particularly rich in potential disease biomarkers. This makes it an ideal biofluid for detecting or monitoring disease processes. Among the metabolomic tools available for urine analysis, NMR spectroscopy has proven to be particularly well-suited, because the technique is highly reproducible and requires minimal sample handling. As it permits the identification and quantification of a wide range of compounds, independent of their chemical properties, NMR spectroscopy has been frequently used to detect or discover disease fingerprints and biomarkers in urine. Although protocols for NMR data acquisition and processing have been standardized, no consensus on protocols for urine sample selection, collection, storage and preparation in NMR-based metabolomic studies have been developed. This lack of consensus may be leading to spurious biomarkers being reported and may account for a general lack of reproducibility between laboratories. Here, we review a large number of published studies on NMR-based urine metabolic profiling with the aim of identifying key variables that may affect the results of metabolomics studies. From this survey, we identify a number of issues that require either standardization or careful accounting in experimental design and provide some recommendations for urine collection, sample preparation and data acquisition.

Keywords: Biomarker; Diagnosis; Human diseases; Metabolites profiling; Metabolomics; Metabonomics; NMR; Recommendations; Standardization; Urine.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Abbiss H, Maker GL, Gummer J, Sharman MJ, Phillips JK, Boyce M, et al. Development of a non-targeted metabolomics method to investigate urine in a rat model of polycystic kidney disease. Nephrology. 2012;17(2):104–110. - PubMed
    1. Abuhijleh AL, Abu Ali H, Emwas A-H. Synthesis, spectral and structural characterization of dinuclear rhodium (II) complexes of the anticonvulsant drug valproate with theophylline and caffeine. Journal of Organometallic Chemistry. 2009;694(22):3590–3596.
    1. Ala-Korpela M. Potential role of body fluid H-1 NMR metabonomics as a prognostic and diagnostic tool. Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics. 2007;7(6):761–773. - PubMed
    1. Alberice JV, Amaral AFS, Grace Armitage E, Antonio Lorente J, Algaba F, Carrilho E, et al. Searching for urine biomarkers of bladder cancer recurrence using a liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry and capillary electrophoresis–mass spectrometry metabolomics approach. Journal of Chromatography A. 2013;1318:163–170. - PubMed
    1. Allard E, Backstrom D, Danielsson R, Sjobberg JR, Bergquist J. Comparing capillary electrophoresis—mass spectrometry fingerprints of urine samples obtained after intake of coffee, tea, or water. Analytical Chemistry. 2008;80(23):8946–8955. - PubMed