Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Apr;141(4):408-16.
doi: 10.4103/0971-5916.159268.

Organ transplant & the psychiatrist: An overview

Affiliations
Review

Organ transplant & the psychiatrist: An overview

B N Anil Kumar et al. Indian J Med Res. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

Organ transplantation has emerged as the saving grace for those who are suffering from end organ disease. Advent of modern surgical procedures and immunosuppressants further decrease morbidity and mortality. Meta-analyses have shown that post-organ transplantation quality of life improves for social, physical and daily activity functioning, but not consistently for psychological health. Psychiatrists can play a useful role not only in selecting the best suitable candidate for the procedure by psychosocial screening but also to tackle post-operation psychological issues that trouble patients as well as caretakers and decrease their quality of life. Issues like selection of patients with psychiatric disorders and substance abuse for transplantation process and their treatment both pre- and post- operation, risky health behaviours, treatment adherence for immunosuppressants and psychological support for caretakers can be better addressed by a psychiatrist who is sensitive towards these issues. Prescribing various psychotropics and immunosuppressants in the background of impaired organ function and drug-drug interaction is further challenging. Thus, psychiatrists need to be knowledgeable about these issues and should be an integral part of organ transplantation team for overall better outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. New Delhi: Ministry of Law, Justice and Company Affairs (Legislative Department); 1994. Jul 11th, The Transplantation of Human Organs Act 1994. No. 42.
    1. Dew MA, Switzer GE, DiMartini AF, Matukaitis J, Fitzgerald MG, Kormos RL. Psychosocial assessments and outcomes in organ transplantation. Prog Transplant. 2000;10:239–59. - PubMed
    1. Bravata DM, Olkin I, Barnato AE, Keeffe EB, Owens DK. Health-related quality of life after liver transplantation: a meta-analysis. Liver Transpl Surg. 1999;5:318–31. - PubMed
    1. Dew MA, Switzer GE, Goycoolea JM, Allen AS, DiMartini AF, Kormos RL, et al. Does transplantation produce quality of life benefits? A quantitative analysis of the literature. Transplantation. 1997;64:1261–73. - PubMed
    1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. The PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097. - PMC - PubMed

Substances