Quantifying the risks of non-oncology phase I research in healthy volunteers: meta-analysis of phase I studies
- PMID: 26115663
- PMCID: PMC4482145
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h3271
Quantifying the risks of non-oncology phase I research in healthy volunteers: meta-analysis of phase I studies
Abstract
Objective: To quantify the frequency and seriousness of adverse events in non-oncology phase I studies with healthy participants.
Design: Meta-analysis of individual, healthy volunteer level data.
Setting: Phase I studies with healthy volunteers conducted between September 2004 and March 2011 at Pfizer's three dedicated phase I testing sites in Belgium, Singapore, and the United States. These included studies in which drug development was terminated.
Participants: 11,028 participants who received the study drug in 394 distinct non-oncology phase I studies, which involved 4620 unique individuals. A total of 2460 (53.2%) participants were involved in only one study, whereas others participated in two or more studies.
Main outcome measures: Adverse events classified as mild, moderate, and severe as well as serious adverse events-defined by the Food and Drug Administration as events that result in death, a life threatening event, admission to hospital, prolongation of existing hospital stay, a persistent or major disability, or a congenital anomaly or birth defect. Pfizer researchers of phase I trials determined adverse events, and serious adverse events were those filed with the FDA.
Results: Overall, 4000 (36.3%) participants who received the study drug experienced no adverse events and 7028 (63.7%) experienced 24,643 adverse events. Overall, 84.6% (n=20,840) of adverse events were mild and 1.0% (n=255) were severe. 34 (0.31%) serious adverse events occurred among the 11,028 participants who received the study agent, with no deaths or life threatening events. Of the 34 serious adverse events, 11 were related to the study drug and seven to study procedures, whereas 16 were unrelated to a study drug or procedure, including four that occurred when the participant was receiving a placebo. Overall, 24.1% (n=5947) of adverse events were deemed to be unrelated to the study drug. With a total of 143 (36%) studies involving placebo, 10.3% (n=2528) of all adverse events occurred among participants receiving placebo. The most common adverse events were headache (12.2%, n=3017), drowsiness (9.8%, n=2410), and diarrhea (6.9%, n=1698). Research on drugs for neuropsychiatric indications had the highest frequency of adverse events (3015 per 1000 participants).
Conclusion: Among 11,028 healthy participants who received study drug in non-oncology phase I studies, the majority (85%) of adverse events were mild. 34 (0.31%) serious adverse events occurred, with no life threatening events or deaths. Half of all adverse events were related to the study drug or to procedures. Extrapolation of these data to other types of phase I studies, especially with biological agents, may not be warranted.
© Emanuel et al 2015.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at
Comment in
-
The secret realm of phase I trials in healthy volunteers.BMJ. 2015 Jun 26;350:h3444. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h3444. BMJ. 2015. PMID: 26116281 No abstract available.
-
Need for a proactive and structured approach to risk analysis when designing phase I trials.BMJ. 2015 Jul 22;351:h3899. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h3899. BMJ. 2015. PMID: 26201349 No abstract available.
-
Phase I studies: the role of publicly funded academic-healthcare partnerships.BMJ. 2015 Jul 22;351:h3889. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h3889. BMJ. 2015. PMID: 26202793 No abstract available.
-
Time to abandon three-phase trials?BMJ. 2016 Feb 17;352:i764. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i764. BMJ. 2016. PMID: 26888378 No abstract available.
References
-
- Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Grady C. What makes research ethical? JAMA 2000;283;2701-11. - PubMed
-
- Lemmens T, Elliott C. Justice for the professional guinea pig. Am J Bioethics 2001;1:51-3. - PubMed
-
- Elliott C, Abadie R. Exploiting a research underclass in phase I clinical trials. N Engl J Med 2008;358:2316-7. - PubMed
-
- Fisher JA. Medical research for hire: the political economy of pharmaceutical clinical trials. Rutgers University Press, 2009.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical