Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2015 Aug;37(8):1813-21.e1.
doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.05.505.

Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis of Medication Adherence With Once-weekly Versus Once-daily Therapy

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis of Medication Adherence With Once-weekly Versus Once-daily Therapy

Kristy Iglay et al. Clin Ther. 2015 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare medication adherence rates for once-weekly (QW) versus once-daily (QD) dosing regimens in patients with chronic disease.

Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify articles published in English-language journals examining the rate of adherence to medications in patients with chronic disease. Relevant studies were identified from January 2002 through August 2013 using PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases. Twenty-two published observational studies reporting adherence were identified by 2 independent reviewers, and 7 articles reported relevant measures for analysis. All studies were conducted in patients with osteoporosis. Meta-analyses estimated (1) mean difference (MD) in adherence (defined using the mean medication possession ratio [MPR]) between QW and QD dosing groups and (2) odds ratio (OR) for adherence (defined using an MPR cutoff of ≥80%) for QW versus QD dosing. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q and I(2) values, and meta-analyses used both fixed- and random-effects models.

Findings: The random-effects meta-analysis revealed a significantly greater MPR with QW compared with QD dosing (pooled MD = 12.29%; 95% CI, 10.76%-13.82%; n = 9 [data reported in 7 publications]). Because of the high level of heterogeneity (I(2) = 83.4%), the fixed-effects model results were not appropriate to report for the pooled MD. When examining the OR for adherence, both fixed- and random-effects models provided similar results due to the low level of heterogeneity (I(2) = 7.9%; n = 5 [data reported in 3 publications]). Using either model, the pooled odds of being adherent (MPR ≥80%) in the QW dosing group was approximately 1.9 times the odds in the QD dosing group (random-effects OR = 1.90; 95% CI, 1.81-2.00; fixed-effects OR = 1.92; 95% CI, 1.84-1.99).

Implications: In our meta-analysis, QW dosing was associated with better adherence levels and greater odds of being adherent compared with QD dosing in patients with osteoporosis.

Keywords: adherence; daily dosing; dosing regimen; medication possession ratio; osteoporosis; weekly dosing.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources