Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jun 29;10(6):e0131046.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131046. eCollection 2015.

High BRAF Mutation Frequency and Marked Survival Differences in Subgroups According to KRAS/BRAF Mutation Status and Tumor Tissue Availability in a Prospective Population-Based Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Cohort

Affiliations

High BRAF Mutation Frequency and Marked Survival Differences in Subgroups According to KRAS/BRAF Mutation Status and Tumor Tissue Availability in a Prospective Population-Based Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Cohort

Halfdan Sorbye et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

RAS and BRAF mutations impact treatment and prognosis of metastatic colorectal cancer patients (mCRC), but the knowledge is based on trial patients usually not representative for the general cancer population. Patient characteristics, treatment and efficacy according to KRAS, BRAF and MSI status were analyzed in a prospectively collected unselected population-based cohort of 798 non-resectable mCRC patients. The cohort contained many patients with poor performance status (39% PS 2-4) and elderly (37% age>75), groups usually not included in clinical trials. Patients without available tissue micro array (TMA) (42%) had worse prognostic factors and inferior survival (all patients; 7m vs 11m, chemotherapy-treated;12m vs 17m). The 92 patients (21%) with BRAF mutation had a poor prognosis regardless of microsatellite instability, but receipt of 1-2nd chemotherapy was similar to wildtype BRAF patients. Median survival in this cohort varied from 1 month in BRAF mutated patients not given chemotherapy to 26 months in wildtype KRAS/BRAF patients <75 years in good PS. TMA availability, BRAF mutation and KRAS mutation were all independent prognostic factors for survival. The observed 21% BRAF mutation incidence is higher than the previously and repeatedly reported incidence of 5-12% in mCRC. Screening for BRAF mutations before selection of treatment is relevant for many patients, especially outside clinical trials. A BRAF mutation only partly explained the very poor prognosis of many mCRC patients. Survival in unselected metastatic colorectal cancer patients is extremely variable and subgroups have an extremely short survival compared to trial patients. Patients without available TMA had worse prognostic factors and shorter survival, which questions the total generalizability of present TMA studies and implies that we lack information on the biologically worst mCRC cases. Lack of available tissue is an important underexposed issue which introduces sample bias, and this should be recognized more clearly when conclusions are made from translational mCRC studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Collection of tumor blocks and tissue micro array (TMA) availability in a population-base cohort of 798 cases with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Fig 2
Fig 2
Overall survival in a population-based cohort of 798 metastatic colorectal cancer patients comparing patients with and without available cancer tissue for tissue microarray (TMA) analyses (Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank test): A. Survival for all patients according to TMA availability (n = 798). Median survival for patients with no TMA was 7m vs 11m for patients with TMA available, p<0.001. B. Survival for patients treated with 1-line chemotherapy according to TMA availability (n = 457). Median survival for patients with no TMA was 12m vs 17m for patients with TMA available, p<0.001.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Survival in a population-based cohort of metastatic colorectal cancer patients with available tumor material for analyses of mutation status (mutBRAF, mutKRAS, wtKRAS/BRAF) (Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank test).
A. Overall survival for all patients according to mutational status (n = 442). Median survival was 7 m for patients with mutBRAF, 12 m if mutKRAS and 14 m if wtKRAS/BRAF. *mutBRAF significantly different from wtKRAS/BRAF and mutKRAS. B. Overall survival in patients receiving chemotherapy according to mutational status (n = 275). Median survival was 12 m for mutBRAF, 18 m for mutKRAS and 21 m for wtKRAS/BRAF. *mutBRAF significantly different from wtKRAS/BRAF and mutKRAS. C. Progression free survival in patients receiving chemotherapy according to mutational status (n = 275), Median progression-free survival was 6.9 m for patients with mutBRAF, 7.1 m if mutKRAS and 8.9 m if wtKRAS/BRAF. D. Overall survival patients in good performance status (PS 0–1) and age< 75, comparing patients with wtKRAS/BRAF vs mutKRAS tumors (n = 178). Median survival was 18 m for patients with mutKRAS and 26 m for patients with wtKRAS/BRAF. Two patients with BRAF mutation status given chemotherapy were missing KRAS analyses.

References

    1. Van Cutsem E, Köhne CH, Láng I, Folprecht G, Nowacki MP, Cascinu S, et al. Cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: updated analysis of overall survival according to tumor KRAS and BRAF mutation status. J Clin Oncol 2011;29: 2011–9. 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.5091 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tveit KM, Guren T, Glimelius B, Pfeiffer P, Sorbye H, Pyrhonen S, et al. Phase III trial of cetuximab with continuous or intermittent fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (Nordic FLOX) versus FLOX alone in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the NORDIC-VII study. J Clin Oncol 2012;30: 1755–62. 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.0915 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Douillard JY, Oliner KS, Siena S, Tabernero J, Burkes R, Barugel M, et al. Panitumumab-FOLFOX4 treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2013;369: 1023–34. 10.1056/NEJMoa1305275 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schwartzberg LS, Rivera F, Karthaus M, Fasola G, Canon JL, Hecht JR,et al. PEAK: a randomized, multicenter phase II study of panitumumab plus modified fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) or bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 in patients with previously untreated, unresectable, wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2014;32: 2240–7. 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.2473 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maughan TS, Adams RA, Smith CG, Meade AM, Seymour MT, Wilson RH, et al. Addition of cetuximab to oxaliplatin-based first-line combination chemotherapy for treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: results of the randomised phase 3 MRC COIN trial. Lancet 2011;377: 2103–14. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60613-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances