Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2017 Sep;25(9):2659-2667.
doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3680-y. Epub 2015 Jul 1.

Outpatient surgery for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is effective and safe

Nanne P Kort  1 , Yoeri F L Bemelmans  2 , Martijn G M Schotanus  2
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Outpatient surgery for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is effective and safe

Nanne P Kort et al. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: There has been increasing interest in accelerated programs for knee arthroplasty. We examined the efficacy and safety of an outpatient surgery (OS) pathway in patients undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).

Methods: This case-controlled study evaluates patients operated for UKA in an OS pathway (n = 20) compared to rapid recovery (RR), the current standard (n = 20). We investigated whether patients could be discharged on the day of surgery, resulting in comparable or better outcome by means of adverse events (AEs) in terms of pain (numerical rating scale, NRS), incidences of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and opiate use (<48 h postoperatively), complication and readmission rates (<3 months postoperatively). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) were obtained preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively.

Results: Postoperative pain (NRS > 5) was the most common reason for prolonged hospital stay in the OS pathway. Eighty-five per cent of the patients were discharged on the day of surgery, whereas 95 % of the patients were discharged on postoperative day 3 in the RR pathway. Overall, median pain scores in both pathways did not exceed a NRS score of 5, without significant differences (RR vs. OS) in the number of patients with PONV (4 vs. 2) and opiate use (11 vs. 9) <48 h postoperatively. At 3 months postoperatively, no significant differences were found for AEs and PROMS between both pathways.

Conclusion: The results of this study illustrates that an OS pathway for UKA is effective and safe with acceptable clinical outcome. Well-established and adequate standardized protocols, inclusion and exclusion criteria and a change in mindset for both the patient and the multidisciplinary team are the key factors for the implementation of an OS pathway.

Level of evidence: Case-control study, Level III.

Keywords: Early mobilization; Outpatient surgery; PONV; Pain management; Partial knee arthroplasty; Short-stay; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Acta Orthop. 2008 Apr;79(2):174-83 - PubMed
    1. Acta Orthop Scand. 2002 Jun;73(3):282-6 - PubMed
    1. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Mar;29(3):516-9 - PubMed
    1. Health Policy. 1996 Jul;37(1):53-72 - PubMed
    1. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Jun;27(6):1159-65.e1 - PubMed