Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2018 May;12(3):514-523.
doi: 10.1177/1557988315592026. Epub 2015 Jun 30.

Penile Dimensions of Diabetic and Nondiabetic Men With Erectile Dysfunction: A Case-Control Study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Penile Dimensions of Diabetic and Nondiabetic Men With Erectile Dysfunction: A Case-Control Study

Nader Salama. Am J Mens Health. 2018 May.

Abstract

This study aimed to report penile dimensions in diabetic and nondiabetic men with erectile dysfunction (ED) and correlate their dimensions with other study variables. A case-control study was designed through retrospective data analysis of diabetic and nondiabetic patients consulting for ED and a control group ( n = 105, each group). Study data retrieved included history, clinical evaluation, and penile dimensions (pendulous length [PL], total length [TL], and circumference [CF]) at flaccid and erect states. Results identified that patients had lower values (mean, cm) for almost all penile dimensions. The diabetic patients identified significant differences in most dimensions, whether in flaccid (PL: 7.46 vs. 7.51 and 7.81, p = .11; TL: 11.8 vs. 12.77 and 12.88, p = .000; CF: 8.84 vs. 9.1 and 9.14, p = .016) or erect state (PL: 9.66 vs. 9.61 and 10, p = .092; TL: 13.96 vs. 14.88 and 15.04, p = .000; CF: 11.56 vs. 12.06 and 11.92, p = .018) as compared with the nondiabetic patients and controls, respectively. No significant correlation was detected between the dimensions and age, durations of diabetes and ED, or erectile function scores. In conclusion, diabetic and nondiabetic patients with ED presented, in varying degrees, significant decline in their penile dimensions, and this was more prevalent in diabetic patients. As changes in penile size could be a silent corollary of comorbidities, monitoring the changes in penile dimensions should be an important component of the clinical checkup of any patient with ED, especially a diabetic patient.

Keywords: diabetes; erectile dysfunction; penile dimensions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abidu-Figueiredo M., Ribeiro I. C., Chagas M. A., Cardoso L. E., Costa W. S., Sampaio F. J. (2011). The penis in diabetes: Structural analysis of connective tissue and smooth muscle alterations in a rabbit model. British Journal of Urology International, 108, 400-404. - PubMed
    1. Aboseif S. R., Wetterauer U., Breza J., Benard F., Bosch R., Stief C. G., . . . Tanagho E. (1990). The effect of venous incompetence and arterial insufficiency on erectile function: An animal model. Journal of Urology, 144, 790-793. - PubMed
    1. Akkus E., Carrier S., Baba K., Hsu G. L., Padma-Nathan H., Nunes L., Lue T. F. (1997). Structural alterations in the tunica albuginea of the penis: Impact of Peyronie’s disease, ageing and impotence. British Journal of Urology, 79, 47-53. - PubMed
    1. Althof S. E., O’Leary M. P., Cappelleri J. C., Crowley A. R., Tseng L. J., Collins S. (2006). Impact of erectile dysfunction on confidence, self-esteem and relationship satisfaction after 9 months of sildenafil citrate treatment. Journal of Urology, 176, 2132-2137. - PubMed
    1. Awwad Z. M., Abu-Hijleh M. O., Basari S. N., Shegam N., Murshidi M., Ajlouni K. (2005). Penile measurements in normal adult Jordanians and in patients with erectile dysfunction. International Journal of Impotence Research, 17, 191-195. - PubMed

Publication types