Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jul-Aug;21(4):322-6.
doi: 10.5152/dir.2015.14451.

The fate of abstracts presented at Turkish national radiology congresses in 2010-2012

Affiliations

The fate of abstracts presented at Turkish national radiology congresses in 2010-2012

Mehtap Beker-Acay et al. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2015 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the analysis and publication rates of abstracts presented at the Turkish National Radiology meetings in 2010-2012.

Methods: Abstracts presented in the national radiology meetings of 2010, 2011, and 2012 were included in the study. The presentations were classified according to presentation type (oral or poster presentations), study type, study design, imaged organ or body systems, imaging modalities, time interval between the presentation and the publication date, and the journal in which the article was published. The conversion rate of presentations into full-text articles in peer-reviewed journals were surveyed through PubMed. The time from presentation in the meetings to publication was determined. The distribution of journals was also demonstrated.

Results: The total number of presentations submitted in three national radiology meetings was 3,192. The publication rate was 11% for the 2010 meeting, 8.2% for the 2011 meeting, and 9.6% for the 2012 meeting. A total of 300 papers were published, with an average of 15 months (range, 0-42 months) between presentation and final publication. The first three refereed international journals with the most number of papers derived from these meetings were Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinical Imaging, and European Journal of Radiology.

Conclusion: The overall publication rate of scientific abstracts from Turkey was lower than those from overseas countries. Encouraging the authors to conduct higher-quality research would raise the publication rate as well as improve the quality and success of our scientific meetings.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Seçil M, Uçar G, Senturk C, Karasu S, Dicle O. Publication rates of scientific presentations in Turkish national radiology congresses. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2005;11:69–73. - PubMed
    1. Miguel-Dasit A, Martí-Bonmatí L, Sanfeliu P, Aleixandre R. Scientific papers presented at the European Congress of Radiology 2000: publication rates and characteristics during the period 2000–2004. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:445–450. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2861-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miguel-Dasit A, Martí-Bonmatí L, Sanfeliu-Montoro A, Aleixandre R, Valderrama JC. Scientific papers presented at the European Congress of Radiology: a two-year comparison. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:1372–1376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0289-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Secil M, Ucar G, Dicle O. Scientific papers presented at the 2000–2001 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) meetings: publication rates during the period 2000–2004. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:2183–2188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0297-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ha TH, Yoon DY, Goo DH, et al. Publication rates for abstracts presented by Korean investigators at major radiology meetings. Korean J Radiol. 2008;9:303–311. http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2008.9.4.303. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources