Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jul 1;107(9):djv178.
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv178. Print 2015 Sep.

Evidence of a Causal Association Between Insulinemia and Endometrial Cancer: A Mendelian Randomization Analysis

Affiliations

Evidence of a Causal Association Between Insulinemia and Endometrial Cancer: A Mendelian Randomization Analysis

Kevin T Nead et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. .

Abstract

Background: Insulinemia and type 2 diabetes (T2D) have been associated with endometrial cancer risk in numerous observational studies. However, the causality of these associations is uncertain. Here we use a Mendelian randomization (MR) approach to assess whether insulinemia and T2D are causally associated with endometrial cancer.

Methods: We used single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with T2D (49 variants), fasting glucose (36 variants), fasting insulin (18 variants), early insulin secretion (17 variants), and body mass index (BMI) (32 variants) as instrumental variables in MR analyses. We calculated MR estimates for each risk factor with endometrial cancer using an inverse-variance weighted method with SNP-endometrial cancer associations from 1287 case patients and 8273 control participants.

Results: Genetically predicted higher fasting insulin levels were associated with greater risk of endometrial cancer (odds ratio [OR] per standard deviation = 2.34, 95% confidence internal [CI] = 1.06 to 5.14, P = .03). Consistently, genetically predicted higher 30-minute postchallenge insulin levels were also associated with endometrial cancer risk (OR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.12 to 1.76, P = .003). We observed no associations between genetic risk of type 2 diabetes (OR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.79 to 1.04, P = .16) or higher fasting glucose (OR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.67 to 1.50, P = .99) and endometrial cancer. In contrast, endometrial cancer risk was higher in individuals with genetically predicted higher BMI (OR = 3.86, 95% CI = 2.24 to 6.64, P = 1.2x10(-6)).

Conclusion: This study provides evidence to support a causal association of higher insulin levels, independently of BMI, with endometrial cancer risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Association of a genetic score of body mass index (BMI)–associated single nucleotide polymorphisms with BMI and a range of potential confounders in the Fenland study (20). Thirty-minute insulin was only available in the Ely study (21), so the sample size is smaller. Given 55 tests (α = 9.1x10-4), the score was associated with BMI and with age at menarche (29). Associations with quantitative traits were tested by linear regression and with binary traits by logistic regression. All statistical tests were two-sided.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Association of a genetic score of fasting insulin–associated single nucleotide polymorphisms with fasting insulin and a range of potential confounders in the Fenland study (20). Thirty-minute insulin was only available in the Ely study (21), so the sample size is smaller. Given 55 tests (α = 9.1x10-4), the score was only associated with fasting insulin. Associations with quantitative traits were tested by linear regression and with binary traits by logistic regression. All statistical tests were two-sided.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Association of a genetic score of insulin secretion–associated single nucleotide polymorphisms with early insulin secretion and a range of potential confounders in the Fenland study (20). Thirty-minute insulin was only available in the Ely study (21), so the sample size is smaller. Given 55 tests (α = 9.1x10-4), the score was only associated with early insulin secretion and with fasting glucose. Associations with quantitative traits were tested by linear regression and with binary traits by logistic regression. All statistical tests were two-sided.

Comment in

References

    1. Zimmet P, Alberti KG, Shaw J. Global and societal implications of the diabetes epidemic. Nature. 2001;414 (6865):782–787. - PubMed
    1. Chen L, Magliano DJ, Zimmet PZ. The worldwide epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus--present and future perspectives. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2012;8 (4):228–236. - PubMed
    1. Emerging Risk Factors C, Seshasai SR Kaptoge S et al. Diabetes mellitus, fasting glucose, and risk of cause-specific death. N Engl J Med. 2011;364 (9):829–841. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kaaks R, Lukanova A. Energy balance and cancer: the role of insulin and insulin-like growth factor-I. Proc Nutr Soc. 2001;60 (1):91–106. - PubMed
    1. Gunter MJ, Hoover DR, Yu H, et al. A prospective evaluation of insulin and insulin-like growth factor-I as risk factors for endometrial cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17 (4):921–929. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms