Polyethylene glycol vs sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate for colonoscopy preparation
- PMID: 26135098
- PMCID: PMC4423298
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1377520
Polyethylene glycol vs sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate for colonoscopy preparation
Abstract
Background and study aims: Polyethylene glycol-based electrolyte solutions (PEG-ELS) and the combination of sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate (SPMC) are commonly used bowel preparation agents. The aim of the present study was to compare the two agents with regard to cleansing efficacy and tolerance among individuals scheduled for outpatient colonoscopy.
Materials and methods: The 368 colonoscopy outpatients at three Norwegian hospitals were randomized to bowel lavage with either PEG-ELS or SPMC. Compliance and patient tolerance were evaluated using a patient questionnaire. Bowel cleansing was evaluated using the Ottawa Bowel Preparation Quality Scale (OBPS), a validated scoring system with scores between 0 (best) and 14.
Results: There was no difference in the cleansing quality between the PEG-ELS and SPMC groups (median OBPS 5.0 in both groups). The group that received SPMC reported better overall patient tolerance than the PEG-ELS group (72.6 % vs 59.0 % reporting no or slight discomfort, P < 0.01). Compliance with the recommended total fluid intake (4 L) was better in the SPMC group than in the PEG-ELS group (94.2 % vs 81.2 % respectively, P < 0.01); moreover, the polyp detection rate was superior (34.3 % vs 23.3 %, P = 0.02).
Conclusion: PEG-ELS and SPMC are equally effective in cleansing efficacy, but SPMC was better tolerated by patients and resulted in superior patient compliance and polyp detection rate.
Clinical trial registration: NCT01624454.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid is as effective as sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate for bowel preparation: A randomized trial.J Dig Dis. 2016 Apr;17(4):268-73. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12337. J Dig Dis. 2016. PMID: 26945825 Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized, endoscopist-blinded, prospective trial to compare the preference and efficacy of four bowel-cleansing regimens for colonoscopy.Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jul;49(7):871-7. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2014.910543. Epub 2014 Jun 18. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014. PMID: 24940942 Clinical Trial.
-
A multicenter randomized phase 4 trial comparing sodium picosulphate plus magnesium citrate vs. polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid for bowel preparation before colonoscopy. The PRECOL trial.Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Dec 8;9:1013804. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1013804. eCollection 2022. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 36569131 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and Patient Tolerability of Split-Dose Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Citrate (SPMC) Oral Solution Compared to the Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) Solution for Bowel Preparation in Outpatient Colonoscopy: An Evidence-Based Review.Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2020 Oct 7;13:449-457. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S237649. eCollection 2020. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2020. PMID: 33116741 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Systematic review and meta-analysis: Sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrate as bowel preparation for colonoscopy.United European Gastroenterol J. 2017 Nov;5(7):917-943. doi: 10.1177/2050640616684696. Epub 2016 Dec 12. United European Gastroenterol J. 2017. PMID: 29163958 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Sodium picosulphate or polyethylene glycol before elective colonoscopy in outpatients? A systematic review and meta-analysis.World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Dec 16;10(12):422-441. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v10.i12.422. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2018. PMID: 30631405 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic review and meta-analysis: sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate vs. polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy preparation.Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 May;72(5):523-32. doi: 10.1007/s00228-016-2013-5. Epub 2016 Jan 28. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2016. PMID: 26818765
-
Optimizing bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a guide to enhance quality of visualization.Ann Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr-Jun;29(2):137-46. doi: 10.20524/aog.2016.0005. Ann Gastroenterol. 2016. PMID: 27065725 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Improvements in the Effectiveness of Early Detection in Colorectal Cancer with Open-Label Randomised Study.J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 29;10(21):5072. doi: 10.3390/jcm10215072. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 34768592 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and safety of PICOPREP tailored dosing compared with PICOPREP day-before dosing for colon cleansing: a multi-centric randomised study.Endosc Int Open. 2017 Apr;5(4):E282-E290. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-102433. Endosc Int Open. 2017. PMID: 28393103 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Canard J M, Debette-Gratien M, Dumas R. et al.A prospective national study on colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy in 2000 in France. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2005;29:17–22. - PubMed
-
- Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers J J. et al.Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:378–384. - PubMed
-
- Quintero E, Castells A, Bujanda L. et al.Colonoscopy vs fecal immunochemical testing in colorectal-cancer screening. NEJM. 2012;366:697–706. - PubMed
-
- Segnan N, Senore C, Andreoni B. et al.Comparing attendance and detection rate of colonoscopy with sigmoidoscopy and FIT for colorectal cancer screening. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:2304–2312. - PubMed
-
- Senore C, Ederle A, Fantin A. et al.Acceptability and side effects of colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy in a screening setting. J Med Screen. 2011;18:128–134. - PubMed
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical