Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2015 Aug;102(2):393-401.
doi: 10.3945/ajcn.114.099184. Epub 2015 Jul 1.

Maternal prepregnancy waist circumference and BMI in relation to gestational weight gain and breastfeeding behavior: the CARDIA study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Maternal prepregnancy waist circumference and BMI in relation to gestational weight gain and breastfeeding behavior: the CARDIA study

Helene Kirkegaard et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Studies suggest that gestational weight gain (GWG) and breastfeeding behavior may influence long-term maternal abdominal fat mass. However, this could be confounded by abdominal fat mass before pregnancy because it is unknown whether abdominal fat mass, independently of body size, affects GWG and breastfeeding behavior.

Objective: We investigated how maternal prepregnancy fat distribution, described by waist circumference (WC) and body mass index (BMI), is associated with GWG and breastfeeding behavior.

Design: We analyzed 1371 live births to 1024 women after enrollment in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults study (1985-1996). For each birth, maternal prepregnancy BMI and WC were measured at year 0 (baseline), 2, 5, or 7 examinations. Recalled GWG and breastfeeding behavior were collected at years 7 and 10. GWG was analyzed by using linear regression and breastfeeding behavior by using logistic regression and discrete-time logistic regression.

Results: Adjusted for potential confounders, a 1-cm larger WC adjusted for BMI was associated with a 0.19-kg (95% CI: -0.29-, -0.10-kg) lower GWG. In contrast, a 1-unit higher BMI adjusted for WC was associated with a 0.27-kg (95% CI: 0.06-, 0.47-kg) higher GWG. The OR for ever breastfeeding compared with never breastfeeding was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90, 0.97) per 1-cm larger WC after adjustment for BMI, whereas it was 1.10 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.19) per 1-unit higher BMI adjusted for WC.

Conclusions: Maternal prepregnancy body size was differently associated with GWG and breastfeeding behavior depending on the location of the fat mass. Thus, maternal fat distribution may be a more important determinant of GWG and breastfeeding behavior than BMI alone.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00005130.

Keywords: breastfeeding; fat distribution; gestational weight gain; maternal; prepregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow diagram of sample selection criteria for the CARDIA study, 1985–1996. A birth was defined as a delivery after 20 wk of gestation. CARDIA, Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Difference in GWG according to centimeter deviation from the predicted waist circumference for a given BMI. The reference value is set to 0; to the left side is a lower waist circumference than predicted by BMI, and to the right side is a larger than predicted waist circumference. The solid line shows the estimated difference in GWG, and the dotted line the 95% CIs. Adjusted for race, study center, gestational age, child birth weight, time from prepregnancy measure to conception, and maternal prepregnancy height, age, parity, marital status, education, work status, smoking, physical activity, alcohol intake, and intake of fat, protein, carbohydrate, and fiber. GWG, gestational weight gain.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
The OR for ever compared with never breastfeeding according to centimeter deviation from the predicted waist circumference for a given BMI. The reference value is set to 0; to the left side is a lower waist circumference than predicted by BMI, and to the right side is a larger than predicted waist circumference. The solid line shows the OR, and the dotted line the 95% CIs. Adjusted for race, study center, gestational age, child birth weight, time from prepregnancy measure to conception, and maternal prepregnancy height, age, parity, marital status, education, work status, smoking, physical activity, alcohol intake, and intake of fat, protein, carbohydrate, and fiber.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gunderson EP, Murtaugh MA, Lewis CE, Quesenberry CP, West DS, Sidney S. Excess gains in weight and waist circumference associated with childbearing: the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study (CARDIA). Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2004;28:525–35. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gunderson EP, Sternfeld B, Wellons MF, Whitmer RA, Chiang V, Quesenberry CP Jr, Lewis CE, Sidney S. Childbearing may increase visceral adipose tissue independent of overall increase in body fat. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2008;16:1078–84. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fraser A, Tilling K, Macdonald-Wallis C, Hughes R, Sattar N, Nelson SM, Lawlor DA. Associations of gestational weight gain with maternal body mass index, waist circumference, and blood pressure measured 16 y after pregnancy: the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). Am J Clin Nutr 2011;93:1285–92. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tørris C, Thune I, Emaus A, Finstad SE, Bye A, Furberg AS, Barrett E, Jasienska G, Ellison P, Hjartaker A. Duration of lactation, maternal metabolic profile, and body composition in the Norwegian EBBA I-Study. Breastfeed Med 2013;8:8–15. - PubMed
    1. McClure CK, Schwarz EB, Conroy MB, Tepper PG, Janssen I, Sutton-Tyrrell KC. Breastfeeding and subsequent maternal visceral adiposity. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2011;19:2205–13. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Associated data