Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May-Jun;46(3):379-393.
doi: 10.1080/15374416.2015.1046179. Epub 2015 Jul 2.

Associations Between Marital Conflict and Adolescent Conflict Appraisals, Stress Physiology, and Mental Health

Affiliations

Associations Between Marital Conflict and Adolescent Conflict Appraisals, Stress Physiology, and Mental Health

Rachel G Lucas-Thompson et al. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2017 May-Jun.

Abstract

The goal of the current study was to examine conflict appraisals and diurnal cortisol production as mediators of the robust association between marital conflict and adolescent adjustment problems. Parents reported their marital conflict and were observed engaging in a marital conflict discussion; they also reported adolescent internalizing and externalizing behaviors. Adolescents (n = 105, 52% female, 10-17 years of age) appraised their parents' marital conflict and reported their internalizing and externalizing behaviors. After the laboratory visit, adolescents provided four saliva samples on each of 2 consecutive days to assess diurnal cortisol production. More-negative marital conflict predicted more self-blame for parental conflict, which in turn predicted less robust decreases in cortisol across the day. Further, this flattened cortisol production pattern mediated the relationship between greater self-blame for parental conflict and adolescents' elevated internalizing behaviors. Feeling responsible for parental conflict appears to be particularly damaging in terms of physiological regulation and adjustment, and may therefore be a particularly useful intervention target.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Conceptual model guiding the current study.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Results of the structural equation model testing the associations between marital conflict, conflict appraisals, and diurnal cortisol production. Note: Standardized estimates for paths are displayed; solid arrows reflect significant paths, whereas dashed arrows reflect nonsignificant paths. The following pathways were modeled but were not displayed in the figure for simplicity: paths from ethnicity (Est. = −.39, p <.01) and family income (Est. = −.18, p = .14) to marital conflict, from wake time to cortisol slope (Est. = .24, p = .10), from dairy consumption to the afternoon cortisol sample (Est. = .28, p <.01), and from pubertal status to cortisol slope (Est. = .27, p <.05), conflict property appraisals (Est. = .35, p <.001), and wake time (Est. = −.17, p <.05). In addition, correlations between each pairwise combination of self-blame, conflict properties, and threat were included (Estimates ranging from .30 to .42, p <.001). Pathways between pubertal status and all other variables were nonsignificant and therefore constrained to 0. Pathways from marital conflict to cortisol level and slope were also non-significant and therefore constrained to 0. RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; CFI = comparative fit index; SRMR = standardized root mean square residual. *p <.05. **p <.01. ***p <.001.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Self-blame (median split used to determine high vs. low groups) and diurnal cortisol production. Note: Error bars represent standard errors.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Results of the structural equation model testing the associations between conflict appraisals, diurnal cortisol production, and internalizing behaviors. Note: Standardized estimates for paths are displayed; solid arrows reflect significant paths, whereas dashed arrows reflect nonsignificant paths. The following pathways were modeled but were not displayed in the figure for simplicity: paths from wake time to the cortisol slope (Est. = .30, p <.05) and dairy consumption to the afternoon cortisol sample (Est. = .32, p <.001); correlations between each pairwise combination of self-blame, conflict properties, and threat (Estimates ranging from .41 to .51, p <.001); paths between income and conflict properties (Est. = −.18, p <.01), threat appraisals (Est. = −.13, p <.05), and cortisol slope (Est. = −.36, p <.05); paths between income and other variables were nonsignificant and therefore constrained to 0. RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; CFI = comparative fit index; SRMR = standardized root mean square residual. *p <.05. **p <.01.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Results of the structural equation model testing the associations between conflict appraisals, diurnal cortisol production, and externalizing behaviors. Note: Standardized estimates are displayed; solid arrows reflect significant paths whereas dashed arrows reflect nonsignificant paths. The following pathways were modeled but were not displayed for simplicity: paths from wake time to cortisol slope (Est. = .30, p <.05) and from dairy consumption to the afternoon cortisol sample (Est. = .31, p <.001); correlations between each pairwise combination of self-blame, conflict properties, and threat (Estimates ranging from .41 to .52, p <.001); paths between income and conflict properties (Est. = −.18, p <.01), threat appraisals (Est. = −.13, p <.05), and cortisol slope (Est. = −.36, p <.05); paths between income and other variables were nonsignificant and therefore constrained to 0; correlations between pubertal status and youth ratings of externalizing (Est. = .26, p <.05) and conflict property appraisals (Est. = .25, p <.001); paths between pubertal status and other variables were nonsignificant and therefore constrained to 0. RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; CFI = comparative fit index; SRMR = standardized root mean square residual. *p <.05. **p <.01.

References

    1. Achenbach TM. Manual for the child behavior checklist: 4–18 and 1991 profile. Burlington, VT: Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont; 1991.
    1. Achenbach TM. The Child Behavior Checklist and related instruments. In: Maruish ME, editor. The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment. 2. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 1999. pp. 429–466.
    1. Achenbach TM, Edelbrock CS. Manual for the youth self-report and profile. Burlington, VT: University Associates in Psychiatry; 1987.
    1. Andersen SL. Trajectories of brain development: Point of vulnerability or window of opportunity? Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 2003;27:3–18. doi: 10.1016/S0149-7634(03)00005-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bevans K, Cerbone A, Overstreet S. Relations between recurrent trauma exposure and recent life stress and salivary cortisol among children. Development and Psychopathology. 2008;20:257–272. doi: 10.1017/S0954579408000126. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms